Which QB should the Rams draft in the 1st Round next year?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
  • 3Like
Reactions: thirteen28, Merlin and Ramstien
Coliseum Ram said:
I have been an admittedly BIG proponent of the thinking: "we MUST get our next Drafted Franchise Quarterback in the 2026 Draft, now that we're armed with TWO 1st Round picks.

I'm now, more leaning of the belief, we should give Stafford a new 3-year deal, and try, if we can, to turn some 2026 Draft Capital into 2027 Draft Currency.
Click to expand...
That’s freaking outrageous imo !!
I’d say in ALL ACCOUNTS!!!

Not a Fan of these QB’s in 2026.I’ll leave that to the scouts though.

I’ve always been big on Circling Players who will be pillars for a Franchise regardless of position.

Trading back for value as well.Maybe even receiving multiple picks & ultimately 3 first rd picks for 2 ???
 
DzRams said:
You are correct! Picks 14 and 24 equate in value to pick 4. And McSnead is aggressive, so we don't have to assume they'll only be in play for a second-tier guy. I'd say the odds are higher for a massive trade-up than for a 2nd or mid-round QB.
Click to expand...
This could also have another “Ad-Verse effect.” If a few QBs are drafted right away, it pushes some talent down who were highly rated. Can you imagine if the top WR falls to around 6 or 7?

Those two 1rst rounders don’t have to be for a QB, necessarily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTackle
fanotodd said:
This could also have another “Ad-Verse effect.” If a few QBs are drafted right away, it pushes some talent down who were highly rated. Can you imagine if the top WR falls to around 6 or 7?

Those two 1rst rounders don’t have to be for a QB, necessarily.
Click to expand...
Sure, it's not necessary, but they're not gonna have a better opportunity to get the QB of the future.

It will make things much easier if the Atlanta pick is around #10.
 
  • Cheers
  • Like
Reactions: fanotodd and Coliseum Ram
Before this week, the Atlanta pick was 14. After today, they moved up ahead of the Texans based on the Texans having the harder strength of schedule. So now at 13... Looking at the rest of the list, probably the only obvious teams that should end up with a better record is Dallas & Baltimore. Not sure who else might have a decent season whi is currently in that top 10. Maybe Washington if they get healthy, but they have a very tough schedule as does the NY Giants... there are a lot of bad teams.

So we might expect to be maybe at best be right at #10... maybe 9 if they are lucky. I could see the Cardinals winning more games with their soft schedule.

5157.webp
 
I get a good feeling looking at this sched. It wouldn't be tough for our Rams, but for Atlanta I think there's going to be a lot of losses. Thinking 7-10 with a +/- of 2. If things go our way we'll be inside that top ten.

1761529075621.webp
 
  • Like
  • Cheers
Reactions: Ramstien and Soul Surfer
DzRams said:
Sure, it's not necessary, but they're not gonna have a better opportunity to get the QB of the future.

It will make things much easier if the Atlanta pick is around #10.
Click to expand...
And depending on which week you watch the falcons…
Big 2nd half coming up.
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: Ramstien
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back