Which QB should the Rams draft in the 1st Round next year?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
I don't watch college football ... so I have no opinions at this time.

Your Best Guess on Simpson ... Is his listed size of 6'2" and 205-210 lbs accurate, or a little over-stated?

Regarding the Cornerbacks ... Do you agree with the above rankings of McCoy (9), Delane (19) and Terrell (21)?
Think it's possible Witherspoon, Williams, Durant and McCreary are all gone next year. That would leave just Forbes, me and you at CB.
I watch Bama and see an NFL QB in Simpson, that's all I know. Has the arm strength to throw the out, doesnt get happy feet in the pocket when the pass rush is on him, and goes through his progressions.
Unless the '26 season doesnt go well, I dont see where the Rams have a shot at the top QB's in '27 so I'm just hoping they get one in the '26 draft. So if it somehow was Simpson, I wouldnt complain one bit
 
I watch Bama and see an NFL QB in Simpson, that's all I know. Has the arm strength to throw the out, doesnt get happy feet in the pocket when the pass rush is on him, and goes through his progressions.
Unless the '26 season doesnt go well, I dont see where the Rams have a shot at the top QB's in '27 so I'm just hoping they get one in the '26 draft. So if it somehow was Simpson, I wouldnt complain one bit
1762973993846.webp
 
  • Not So Sure
Reactions: dieterbrock
My take i agree with the lack starts on Simpson. That said I think he has all the tools including vision and his read progression. I'd be OK with drafting him based on him sitting behind 9 or Garapolli.
Agreed. I'd be very happy with Simpson as our QBotF. To be clear I love the player and I think he's legit, just a shame he's gonna probably go before we can get him.
 
  • High Five
Reactions: BC Ramfan
Agreed. I'd be very happy with Simpson as our QBotF. To be clear I love the player and I think he's legit, just a shame he's gonna probably go before we can get him.

Well i would say there is still a way to get into the Top 2 or 3 in the Draft and take Simpson. Though with the way Stafford is playing ill call it unlikely.

Say a team like Tennessee (Ward) or New Orleans (Shough) pick 1-3 and decide theyre not taking a Quarterback. Would they trade pick to us for Atlanta's 1st (10th?) our 1st ( 24-32?) and more?

I think it CAN be done, though i venture to guess the Rams dont take this route and instead line up Stafford for 2-3 more years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien and Merlin

Definitely would be an upgrade and a movable chess piece that could play all over. The guy mentioned that he had position flex. Again, I doubt we take a LB high. Now if there are no QB's worth taking and Tate & Tyson are gone, maybe you move back and look at a guy like this.

Getting an extra pick or two maybe gives you flexibility to then move up a little with your 2nd first to target a guy you like at that spot. Maybe there you move up for 2nd tier WRs like Chris Bell or Denzel Boston, or even a CB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stl2La
Well i would say there is still a way to get into the Top 2 or 3 in the Draft and take Simpson. Though with the way Stafford is playing ill call it unlikely.

Say a team like Tennessee (Ward) or New Orleans (Shough) pick 1-3 and decide theyre not taking a Quarterback. Would they trade pick to us for Atlanta's 1st (10th?) our 1st ( 24-32?) and more?

I think it CAN be done, though i venture to guess the Rams dont take this route and instead line up Stafford for 2-3 more years.
Yes if Stafford keeps playing this way, and I see no reason why he won't unless injuries decimate us, it will keep the Rams from moving up. You can't expend picks to move up for a QBotF if you believe in your current QB. And it's a good problem too.

Now you can take a QBotF. And that's bad enough from Stafford's perspective because it eliminates a potential top wideout or a talented OT or a defensive player who gets him the ball back quicker. But if you're going to position for a QB it had best be sliding down, otherwise it's going to be a hard sell to Stafford. And that matters. His opinion on this stuff matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coliseum Ram
Now you can take a QBotF. And that's bad enough from Stafford's perspective because it eliminates a potential top wideout or a talented OT or a defensive player who gets him the ball back quicker.
I see this and I wonder if people don't think he realizes the end is near and expects it as the professional that he is. Also you know full well because we take a QBotF in the 1st instead of another position doesn't mean we can't address said position in later rounds.

IMO Stafford is too smart to worry about this stuff especially having flirted with retirement for a few years now.
 
I see this and I wonder if people don't think he realizes the end is near and expects it as the professional that he is. Also you know full well because we take a QBotF in the 1st instead of another position doesn't mean we can't address said position in later rounds.

IMO Stafford is too smart to worry about this stuff especially having flirted with retirement for a few years now.
There's two sides to that coin. It's easy for us as fans to sit back and think he's fine with it, but for a player who is all-in and only has x years left (in his mind) it would be understandable for him to think those top picks should be used by the team in an all-in manner to make a run.
 
There's two sides to that coin. It's easy for us as fans to sit back and think he's fine with it, but for a player who is all-in and only has x years left (in his mind) it would be understandable for him to think those top picks should be used by the team in an all-in manner to make a run.
Again I think we all know Stafford is smart enough to know that it doesn't have to be a 1st rounder he's throwing the ball to. There are 2 first round picks on the entire offense here and he's balling the hell out. He knows he doesn't need a 1st round WR with McVay.
 
I see this and I wonder if people don't think he realizes the end is near and expects it as the professional that he is. Also you know full well because we take a QBotF in the 1st instead of another position doesn't mean we can't address said position in later rounds.

IMO Stafford is too smart to worry about this stuff especially having flirted with retirement for a few years now.
To add to this, I know Stafford's opinion will carry some weight, but I don't see the Rams organization as giving too much sway to a player. They're gonna do what they feel is best for the Rams. We not me.

This is the same brain trust that encouraged Stafford to go solicit offers from other teams this last offseason and was willing to lose him.
 
To add to this, I know Stafford's opinion will carry some weight, but I don't see the Rams organization as giving too much sway to a player. They're gonna do what they feel is best for the Rams. We not me.

This is the same brain trust that encouraged Stafford to go solicit offers from other teams this last offseason and was willing to lose him.
It matters.

In fact there's a certainty that they would let him know before they draft a QB in the early going. Not that he ok's it. But they show the man that respect for who he is by giving him a heads up that it's coming and hey you're still our dog and he's for the future and all that. Or they have the conversation before the draft and preload him on the possibility on the few they really like. Or both.

I think the casual dismissal of the QB feelings is unrealistic given that they just had to clear the room out to have McVay and Stafford agree on structure to make him feel, as Stafford put it and I paraphrase, that he was important to the team. There is zero chance they would make a move for a QB up high without telling him. And I think it is downright unlikely they would move up for a QB by using significant draft capital unless they are convinced that QB's value is so great that they are willing to accept pissing off the starter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ramstien
It matters.

In fact there's a certainty that they would let him know before they draft a QB in the early going. Not that he ok's it. But they show the man that respect for who he is by giving him a heads up that it's coming and hey you're still our dog and he's for the future and all that. Or they have the conversation before the draft and preload him on the possibility on the few they really like. Or both.

I think the casual dismissal of the QB feelings is unrealistic given that they just had to clear the room out to have McVay and Stafford agree on structure to make him feel, as Stafford put it and I paraphrase, that he was important to the team. There is zero chance they would make a move for a QB up high without telling him. And I think it is downright unlikely they would move up for a QB by using significant draft capital unless they are convinced that QB's value is so great that they are willing to accept pissing off the starter.
I agree that it matters and as I stated his opinion will carry some weight. But let's not overstate it. They're still gonna do what's best for the Rams even if he's upset.

They upset him last year when they told him to go solicit offers; they're not afraid of that.

Of course they'll tell him their potential plans, but I don't feel they'd be looking for his approval or allow his disapproval to change acting on what they feel is best, including trading up for a QBotF.

Ideally, you don't want to piss off the starter but if they're convinced that making a major move for the future is the way to go, I don't see them being afraid to piss him off. The entire Rams organization has brass balls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coliseum Ram
Will the Rams drafts a QB, or trade for a proven veteran again. Not sure who that could be, but I can't rule it out.
Who could we possibly get for 2 2026 and 1 2027 first round picks? I can think of one very good QB who is playing for a pretty terrible organisation in the Bengals. But that is wishful thinking unless they stupidly fire his HC and he rightly becomes disgruntled. Cincy’s ownership are more than capable of such stupidity but it would more likely have to be a player whose situation is similar to Stafford’s was. I can’t think of anyone, playing on a 3rd contract, can you?

Lawrence is the most obvious but I have serous doubts about him playing in a timing offense

The alternative is a first round QB reclamation project which would probably cost us no picks
 
  • Cheers
Reactions: Merlin
I agree that it matters and as I stated his opinion will carry some weight. But let's not overstate it. They're still gonna do what's best for the Rams even if he's upset.

They upset him last year when they told him to go solicit offers; they're not afraid of that.

Of course they'll tell him their potential plans, but I don't feel they'd be looking for his approval or allow his disapproval to change acting on what they feel is best, including trading up for a QBotF.

Ideally, you don't want to piss off the starter but if they're convinced that making a major move for the future is the way to go, I don't see them being afraid to piss him off. The entire Rams organization has brass balls.
Who are we going to draft from this pretty underwhelming field of 2026 QBs that Stafford would feel threatened by? We had one of the best QBs in the league play for us when he was injured and yet Baker remains no match… Perhaps that was our best opportunity but personally I wouldn’t swap our future for the past three seasons including this one
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ram Ts