To his credit, Goff took the comments in stride, saying he has
"a great relationship" with McVay and can handle criticism. But given the four-game slump, what's going on with No. 16?
Studying the All-22 Coaches Film, the quarterback is solid with his footwork and fundamentals when operating from a clean pocket. Goff sets up quickly and delivers dimes when he isn't under pressure. He continues to display masterful ball-handling and execution on play-action fakes, and fires the ball to his receivers within the strike zone on intermediate throws between the numbers. When Goff is able to play in rhythm, he is as good as any quarterback in football.
That said, the veteran has struggled when opponents disrupt the timing of the Rams' passing game through pressure or tight coverage. As a play-action-heavy team, the Rams rely on deception to create easy opportunities for the quarterback. The combination of offensive line movement and ball fakes lures second-level defenders to the line of scrimmage, leaving huge voids for Goff to exploit on an assortment of mid-range routes. The tactics worked brilliantly during the first half of the season, with Goff connecting on 69.2 percent of his play-action passes over the opening eight games, posting sparkling numbers across the board: 8.8 yards per attempt, 6:0 TD-to-INT ratio, 115.7 passer rating. Goff was able to generate outstanding production via play-action while only tossing the ball an average of 6.4 air yards per attempt.
Over the past three games, though, he has completed just 63.3 percent of his throws off play-action, with slashed figures everywhere else, too: 7.0 yards per attempt, 0:3 TD-to-INT ratio, 44.7 passer rating. Goff is actually averaging 8.3 air yards per attempt, but posting significantly diminished returns. Why?
McVay has changed his play-calling emphasis to feature more traditional play-action passes instead of the stretch-bootleg combinations that were so effective earlier in the season. During the first four weeks of the season, per Next Gen Stats, the Rams' play-action stretched outside of the tackle box on 28.3 percent of play-action dropbacks. Since Week 5, that figure has dropped to 19.5 percent. The decrease in movement passes (bootlegs/nakeds) is puzzling, based on Goff's efficiency and effectiveness on such plays this season.
Just check out this breakdown of Goff's play-action production in 2020, courtesy of NGS:
Table inside Article
| Dropbacks | Comp pct | Yds per att | TD-to-INT | Passer rating |
---|
PA inside tackle box | 105 | 64.4 | 7.8 | 4:3 | 88.9 |
PA outside tackle box | 32 | 80.0 | 10.6 | 2:0 | 133.2 |
What does that tell us? McVay deserves blame here, too, for failing to put his quarterback in the best position to succeed. The coach should consider utilizing more bootlegs and naked passes to get his quarterback into a groove.
The stretch-bootleg concepts create hesitation for the defense, giving Goff layups in the flat (bootlegs frequently feature an eligible receiver in the flat with an intermediate crosser working across the field at 10-to-12 yards). The catch-and-run nature of these completions enables the quarterback to pick up cheap yards on throws that travel fewer than 5 yards. Given Goff's effectiveness and efficiency in executing bootlegs, it makes sense for the Rams to scheme them up more to help the QB1 repair his confidence over the next few weeks.
As a quarterback who is heavily reliant on his play-caller to craft a plan that gives him the best chance to succeed, Goff's failures are really a byproduct of McVay not being on his game. If the offensive wizard wants his QB1 to perform better down the stretch, it is on him to maximize Goff's strengths, instead of calling a series of plays that highlight some of the 26-year-old's deficiencies as a rhythm passer