- Joined
- Jun 29, 2016
- Messages
- 3,179
- Name
- greg
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6651/f6651f2cf3e70562e75a568c080039475e8a83f2" alt="Mood: A1 LA13"
I think this is a huge part of the running game too....Don't understand why some don't see this.
Not directed at you, but you mentioned both Watkins and Austin so I quoted you.
If Watkins is taking up 2 defenders and Austin is talking up 2 defenders, that only leaves 7 defenders for the rest of the team. How is it then that with these two super decoys we can't score on every play?
I don't think a successful decoy has to be able to get a TD on any given play. They really only need to be able to get a solid 8 to 10 yards. Or more if you forget about them. I think Pharaoh Cooper could probably do that on the jet sweeps. Let them ignore him and we'll take the first down and more. Or if they're paying attention we'll take the second and short. We'll sustain drives and run time of the clock.
I don't think P Cooper can do 100%of what Austin can do. But he can probably do 80% and all that in addition to what he's already doing. The less variety of things Austin is capable of doing the less of a decoy he becomes. And that's kind of where it is now I think. He's becoming one dimensional. The fake is now the standard and the actual play involving him is the decoy.
They draw attention in different ways - it's not that they both are being double teamed.
Austin moves the linebackers as the snap begins. This isn't "taking up" anyone so much as getting guys leaning the wrong way - which allows Gurley to rip off 7-8 yard runs.
Sammy is taking the #1CB and drawing safety attention deep - this opens up the 8-15 yard routes which we have seen a ton of.
The point is, they aren't really decoys at all - they are viable options. When the D fails to respect these viable options, they will be burned by them.
We had this very same argument for years about Chris longI agree about Tavon and Watkins. But I just can't agree about Quinn. Yet! He's holding his own. he had 2 tackles / 2 Tackles for loss and 1 QB Hit during the Jag's game. that's the "Stats" but I saw him getting more pressure than the stats reflect in this game and other games!
And it's a very valid point in both cases! It's called "Intangibles!"We had this very same argument for years about Chris long
I'm not saying it's invalid so not sure why the need to bold and exclamation point the counter. I'm was just trying to make comparisonsAnd it's a very valid point in both cases! It's called "Intangibles!"
I believe Austin’s snaps can be admirably handled by Cooper.
I'ma go ahead and say I don't like Sammy Watkins, I think he is problem, and runs super lazy routes, and half asses his effort at times. I don't expect him to be with us after this season.
In case you have never noticed before, I always write in Bold. and the exclamation point are just my style!I'm not saying it's invalid so not sure why the need to bold and exclamation point the counter. I'm was just trying to make comparisons
Exactly. And I think there's probably a lot of guys that can be a "viable option" on a jet sweep and the handful of other run plays he's used in now. Maybe not Austin dangerous, but just dangerous enough to have the same effect. Sans that long ticket from the Hawks game, but I bet they could also be effective on other ways as well.
Fair enough lol no I've never actually noticedIn case you have never noticed before, I always write in Bold. and the exclamation point are just my style!
How can you say this with such certainty? Maybe...If Sammy was running that route where Woods stopped inexplicitly and turned into the defender and fumbled, Sammy takes that to the house. Woods is so used to being in tight space that he had no idea how wide open he was, but Sammy would have known.
ok man...I'm good with your edits. whatever it takes to make you comfortable. Thanks.How can you say this with such certainty? Maybe...
"If Sammy was running that route where Woods stopped inexplicitly and turned into the defender and fumbled, Sammy might have taken it to the house. Woods is so used to being in tight space that he had no idea how wide open he was, but Sammy might have known."
Preach it Brother... preach it!!The goal with this offense isn't to feed star players. It's to spread it around in an unpredictable manner and get the W.
And they’re not really the players that many had expected.
Goff’s doing fine. Better than fine, really.
Gurley is having a helluva season.
Sully has excelled at C.
Barron has more than held up at ILB so far.
Nope, the above are all exceeding our expectations.
Here are my “problematic three”.
Tavon Austin. My feelings are well known. He’s a man without a position. And weakens the team when he’s placed on the field.
Robert Quinn. Is it fair to say that he’s degenerated into our weakest link on D? I think so.
Sammy Watkins. Not too early to call him problematic is it? Something’s just not “right” there, okay? Big disappointment compared to expectations, so far.
Honestly, I think Tavon and Quinn will be gone next year. Watkins? Let’s just say that he needs to start impressing if he expects to be rewarded with a big Ram contract.
Sigh...
Feels good to get that off my chest.
Agreed. Not only does Pharoh have the ability to run those as a decoy, but he can also <gasp> give McVay the flexibility of putting him out there on routes in the passing game.