Occam’s razor.
Here’s the core issue with what fans keep asking for: absolute consistency and zero missed blatant fouls. That standard sounds reasonable, but it ignores reality.
If AI were calling fouls, the game would grind to a halt. Virtually every play contains some kind of foul, and automated officiating would turn every game into a nonstop flag fest. That would be a massive step in the wrong direction.
Officiating didn’t become a weekly controversy until the late ’90s, when TV broadcasts, HD cameras, and endless angles made it possible to scrutinize every frame. The problem is that referees are watching everything in real time, at full speed, and they’re human.
Are they perfect? No. Are there shady refs in the NFL today? I’m sure there are at least a few. But the truth is, officiating has always been bad—and it always will be—because of those realities.
Realistically, the only improvement would be having New York involved in every game, actively reviewing plays and correcting calls on the field more often than they already do. Even then, they’ll still get some wrong. It would be better than what we have now, but be careful what you wish for—those people can be bought off too.