- Joined
- May 9, 2018
- Messages
- 5,375
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #61
That would make me very happy.Danielle Hunter can’t be tagged.
He’s had double digit sacks 4 of last 5 years and more than 14 3 of 5.
He’s the guy.
That would make me very happy.Danielle Hunter can’t be tagged.
He’s had double digit sacks 4 of last 5 years and more than 14 3 of 5.
He’s the guy.
This is a really important season. Things are close to being aligned for us if the OL is good. So I'd pull out all stops in creativity on that deal to get it done. Then come pick 19 we might have a chance to bring in a LT too if one is there. Either way our OL has a high floor and should start the season in actual good form instead of us needing to scrape Stafford off the turf for six plus weeks.Not sure Dotson is realistic. I saw the top OG contracts ate 18-20M a yr. If he gets even 16-17M offer, I doubt the Rams go that high. Probably will trade back for an extra top 80 pick and draft a OG on day 2.
I would like to have him, but not sure 18M a yr is smart for a OG and could be a contract that they regret.This is a really important season. Things are close to being aligned for us if the OL is good. So I'd pull out all stops in creativity on that deal to get it done. Then come pick 19 we might have a chance to bring in a LT too if one is there. Either way our OL has a high floor and should start the season in actual good form instead of us needing to scrape Stafford off the turf for six plus weeks.
I would like to have him, but not sure 18M a yr is smart for a OG and could be a contract that they regret.
Maybe take an OT at 19 and move Jackson to OG or the rookie starts at OG his rookie yr. Ogden did that for a yr so not out of the ordinary.
The kid from Oregon St looks like a mauler who could play inside for a yr.
I would just feel more comfortable if he had a pedigree like Nelson or Martin, consistent play throughout his career, in order to give him such a payday. Instead this was his best yr by far it would appear, and it was his contract yr. That's a concern.I really don't know why people under-value good OG's. Good running games start with beef in the middle that can move guys out of the way, like Dotson & Avila. Hands down, they are the reason Kyren had such a good year. Ya maybe we'd over pay a bit on Dotson. But good God we've needed a strong OL, and we finally have one. Gotta do what we can to keep both of them IMHO.
I would just feel more comfortable if he had a pedigree like Nelson or Martin, consistent play throughout his career, in order to give him such a payday. Instead this was his best yr by far it would appear, and it was his contract yr. That's a concern.
Either he has matured and he will continue to play well, or he reverts back to lackadaisical penalties and inconsistent play after getting paid.
That is s big gamble when talking about a 18-20M a yr OGh
Madubuike picked a great time to have a huge season. Think he will sign a huge contract.One guy I overlooked is Justin Madubuike, DT, Ravens. Probably won’t make it to the market, but he’d definitely be a guy worth looking at if he did.
I'm probably in the minority, but I'm not totally convinced that the organization really has to go out and spend big money on external talent during the 1st or maybe not even the 2nd wave of free agency.
At the moment, I sort of lean on them signing their key guys, drafting well, and picking up cheaper stopgap types like Demarcus Robinson, Ahkello Witherspoon & John Johnson III like they did in 2023. Or did they just get lucky?
I don't know that people undervalue them per se... it's just allocation of resources. Can we allocate that much money to Dotson when he have such big needs elsewhere? Especially since we seemed to have hit on Avila. I could make an argument either way. But if we pay him, that just takes a big chunk from the pot that could go elsewhere like for a corner or edge.I really don't know why people under-value good OG's. Good running games start with beef in the middle that can move guys out of the way, like Dotson & Avila. Hands down, they are the reason Kyren had such a good year. Ya maybe we'd over pay a bit on Dotson. But good God we've needed a strong OL, and we finally have one. Gotta do what we can to keep both of them IMHO.
Hunter is almost certainly going to be the best pass rusher who hits FA. Issue is his age. He turns 30 next year. You're almost certainly going to have to give him guaranteed money that'll basically keep him on the roster through his age-32 (if not age-33) season. It's a risky proposition. I'd lean towards Bryce Huff.Danielle Hunter can’t be tagged.
He’s had double digit sacks 4 of last 5 years and more than 14 3 of 5.
He’s the guy.
The Mack thing is something I’ve brought up.. worth monitoring.Hunter is almost certainly going to be the best pass rusher who hits FA. Issue is his age. He turns 30 next year. You're almost certainly going to have to give him guaranteed money that'll basically keep him on the roster through his age-32 (if not age-33) season. It's a risky proposition. I'd lean towards Bryce Huff.
Why Huff? He's only about to turn 26 years old, has been one of the NFL's most productive pass rusher on a per-snap basis, and should be cheaper than the top dogs in FA. I think Huff is a lot like Shaq Barrett. He's been stuck playing a rotational role, but when he's finally given a chance to start, he's going to be a very productive pass rusher. His run defense won't be great, but you can deal with that issue if he's a guy who gives you 10+ sacks and a lot of pressure.
The dark horse to watch out for is Khalil Mack. The Chargers are in a cap hole, and they may not be able to keep Mack and Bosa. It's possible they trade Bosa instead of Mack, but with Mack being the older player, I could see him being on the trade market this offseason.
Is anyone concerned with Snead's comments that they're going to be disciplined approach in the 1st wave of FA.
...
The Mack thing is something I’ve brought up.. worth monitoring.
Huff is definitely interesting… but I’ve read he’s truly bad against the run.
Not mediocre… bad.
Is that off.
Wait... isn't that the issue with Uche too, pretty bad against run?That's why I'd go after Uche. He's not going to be a huge sack guy, and he's had injury concerns, but he's just a solid young player who will only be twenty-six next year.
Wait... isn't that the issue with Uche too, pretty bad against run?