Attitudes in this thread would change dramatically if Malcom Brown fails to convert
Every single one of you would be asking why Gurley wasn’t not in there if Brown got stuffed.
Without questioning his health, it is FAIR to be ponderous about our goal line sniffing, Touchdown making, All Pro running back not in during two key red zone visits.
Homerism and hopium running rampant here guys. What makes it bad to me though, is how ya’ll act like it’s a freakin crime to even question these events and take everything so far over the top with your emphatic defense that nothing is wrong.
Saving Gurley lol. Ok bubba! Because now Brown is the touchdown maker around here
He did look great to me though. I thought he looked pretty spry!
Attitudes in this thread would change dramatically if Malcom Brown fails to convert
Every single one of you would be asking why Gurley wasn’t not in there if Brown got stuffed.
Without questioning his health, it is FAIR to be ponderous about our goal line sniffing, Touchdown making, All Pro running back not in during two key red zone visits.
Homerism and hopium running rampant here guys. What makes it bad to me though, is how ya’ll act like it’s a freakin crime to even question these events and take everything so far over the top with your emphatic defense that nothing is wrong.
Saving Gurley lol. Ok bubba! Because now Brown is the touchdown maker around here
He did look great to me though. I thought he looked pretty spry!
McVay could easily say "Todd has been a workhorse for 4 straight years and we don't want to shorten his career by continuing to do that so we are easing up a little bit. We want him to be around for a long time".
The questions would stop or at least be reduced dramatically.
I'm simply pointing out that reporters asking questions is what they are supposed to do. I don't get why people are angry with them for doing that.
People want to believe that his knee is fine and there is nothing wrong and that yesterdays game is proof of that. And that nobody should question him on the knee issue.
Gurley could change the narrative TODAY by answering the questions. McVay could also.
They've gone out of their way to avoid discussing it, this is going to create conjecture and bring up questions until they address it.
He said to the media that Gurley wasn't on a pitch count but then he gets 15 touches and is sidelined for big parts of the game.
That's gonna make people ask questions.
Attitudes in this thread would change dramatically if Malcom Brown fails to convert
Every single one of you would be asking why Gurley wasn’t not in there if Brown got stuffed.
Without questioning his health, it is FAIR to be ponderous about our goal line sniffing, Touchdown making, All Pro running back not in during two key red zone visits.
Homerism and hopium running rampant here guys. What makes it bad to me though, is how ya’ll act like it’s a freakin crime to even question these events and take everything so far over the top with your emphatic defense that nothing is wrong.
Don’t put words in my mouth or tell me how to act.Yo, did you actually watch the game yesterday? They didn't just bring Brown in to vulture goal-line work away from Gurley. They gave Brown 2 complete series with the offense in which the offense happened to score on both drives. Stop acting like Gurley was in the entire drive and they purposefully pulled him so Brown could get the touchdowns. That's not what happened.
the questions didn't stop or reduce dramatically. they got stupider.
He HAS answered the questions! He's repeatedly said his knee is fine, which it currently is.
Don’t put words in my mouth or tell me how to act.
I don’t have a dawg in the fight. My message is simply that it’s Fair to have concerns. Thanks.
perhsps you should take a step back or fuck off. You are taking me, this topic, and yourself waaay too seriously if you think I have ANY NARRATIVE AT ALL !!!!Your message is built on a false narrative but whatever you say...
And you were clearly insinuating that Brown was gonna be used as more of the goal-line back so don't act like I put words in your mouth either. Perhaps you should choose your words more carefully.
They’re a prime example of what’s wrong in this issue. They’re fantasy sports focused. They and fantasy players, of which I one, are the ones creating the problem..
here are the jerks from rotoworld chiming in. apparently he didn't seem pleased about his usage. that's what these fuckwits got out of his curt responses to the dumb questions the journalists were asking him, trying to bait him into saying he wasn't happy with his usage.
their all fucking clowns.
When asked how he felt about splitting carries with Malcolm Brown in Sunday's Week 1 victory over the Panthers, Todd Gurley said, "Felt good."
Gurley led the Rams with 103 yards from scrimmage in Sunday's season-opening win at Carolina but didn't seem particularly pleased about his usage, logging just 15 touches to Malcolm Brown's 11. While it may be jarring to see Gurley—a three-time All-Pro selection and one of the league's highest earners at his position—reduced to a committee role, Sunday's split was consistent with how the Rams employed him during last year's postseason. Maybe that's for the best given Gurley's chronic knee issues, which led to him taking a backseat to C.J. Anderson down the stretch last year. Even if it wasn't the workload he anticipated, Gurley was extremely efficient against the Panthers, cruising to a healthy 6.9 yards per carry in the winning effort. Assuming the Rams continue to use him in tandem with Brown, Touchdown Todd is probably best viewed as an RB2 going forward.
SOURCE: Los Angeles Times