Classic Rams
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2016
- Messages
- 3,574
Mixed feelings on this. Sure the media gets annoying pecking away at the very thing we're tired of hearing. (They still can't let Krapperdick go!!!) I look at it as each media member wants to be first to break some big story for whatever reason, clicks or notoriety. (Reporter A: "First!!!") So I get that. Annoying little cockroaches sometimes. Some don't care if they ruffle rich athlete feathers. And as we know the story about Gurley is his health if he misses more than a few plays.
Another thing i see is that they also practically put him in the HoF due to his performnace and numbers before the injury thing came up. So taking another angle on it... what if Dickerson ever had to share the ball? When he missed games it was because of a holdout, and even back then that was the main story in early 1985. What if Emmitt Smith had to share duties after missing games? Or Jim Brown?? We know Gurley is a superstar so if anything happens to his workload questions come up. "He didn't play the whole 1st half but finished with 300 total yards what's wrong??"
I for one along with some of you am happy we have a good backup in Malcolm, and that the Rams are addressing possible future concerns with decent RB depth.
Another thing i see is that they also practically put him in the HoF due to his performnace and numbers before the injury thing came up. So taking another angle on it... what if Dickerson ever had to share the ball? When he missed games it was because of a holdout, and even back then that was the main story in early 1985. What if Emmitt Smith had to share duties after missing games? Or Jim Brown?? We know Gurley is a superstar so if anything happens to his workload questions come up. "He didn't play the whole 1st half but finished with 300 total yards what's wrong??"
I for one along with some of you am happy we have a good backup in Malcolm, and that the Rams are addressing possible future concerns with decent RB depth.