The befuddling belief in LA Rams newest tight end Jacob Harris

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

The befuddling belief in LA Rams newest tight end Jacob Harris​

The LA Rams have built a roster around going top shelf for stars, and bottom shelf for bargains. Even though the team has a fair share of the middle shelf talent, capable starting players who can deliver quality starts, but whose names never enter Pro Bowl discussion, it’s the extremes that command the headlines of Los Angeles.

The luster of an NFL elite player can be addictive and mesmerizing. It creates an effect on the rest of the squad of elevating their play and perhaps giving teammates the chance to produce at the highest level of their careers. We cite that aura of positive influence on the LA Rams as the Aaron Donald effect. So when it comes down to evaluating talent, for many players who could be considered for a role with the team, it’s not based on their virtues alone, but how well that person might play in the company of AD.

And that’s not fair to either player. But it’s so tempting to do.

Now the LA Rams have added new veteran quarterback Matthew Stafford, and before he has thrown one regulating NFL pass for the LA Rams, the temptation to apply that same effect upon the receivers in the room is equally as tempting. Robert Woods, Cooper Kupp, Tyler Higbee, and even Van Jefferson could enjoy career-high seasons. Then again, they may not. It’s tough to say, simply because we can’t truly know how well Stafford will play in HC Sean McVay’s offense.

But the coaches are hinting so far. Players’ jaws are dropping. Post-practice interviews seem to have a skip to them. The offense has been reportedly ‘holding their own.’ against the defense this year in training camp. All positives chunks of coal to throw into the preseason furnace. All bits of fuel to burn the optimism white-hot for this season. All bits of data to digest, analyze, and theorize about the 2021 NFL season.

Sky’s the limit skyscraper

Complicating all of that is the matter of a young man with the sky-is-the-limit potential but incredibly light football experience in the form of 6-foot-5 219-pound tight end Jacob Harris. He can make plays that flash All-Pro potential. Then, just as suddenly, he can appear to be a guy who truly won’t make the roster. The challenge right now is that he is neither, and yet he is both.



View: https://twitter.com/ramsnfl/status/1428040346798235654?s=21

Let’s back it up a moment.

The young man who was drafted by the LA Rams with the 141st pick of the 2021 NFL Draft was chosen a bit higher than his fifth-round grande. But he is a very tall, fast, and athletic target out of the University of Central Florida (UCF) who walked onto the football team in 2017. He was a special teams ace in 2018 and finally latched on as a bona fide offensive weapon in 2019. He further flexed his muscle on offense in 2020 before entering the 2021 NFL Draft.

Due to his size, strength, power, and athleticism, it is hard to tell how much of Harris’ sudden success has to do with his football acumen, and how much is simply due to the fact that he was so much bigger stronger, and faster than the competition in college football. That disparity of his talent to that of the competition will narrow considerably in the NFL. Still, the Rams coaching staff, and in particular, Coach McVay believes in Harris’ ability to achieve his full NFL potential.

He is already appearing to be leaning towards a successful NFL career, albeit it is far too early to conclude it is a sure thing. But he is starting to look the part of an NFL receiver (although his tight end blocking skills are nothing to cheer about just yet.). He was targeted seven times against the LA Chargers (even during the time when they played starters on defense). He caught four passes for 43 yards, enough to lead the receivers on the day.

Rams’ red zone O can really shine with Harris

Hey, he’s inexperienced. He’s raw. And he’s young. All of that combined comes to one conclusion. He will get better. How much better is up to each of us to decide. Then, it will be up to him and the LA Rams to deliver. How quickly depends on a number of factors.

One element that is certainly necessary and is very present is opportunity. With the departure of Gerald Everett to free agency, and the disappointing production of Brycen Hopkins so far, the LA Rams need someone to rise through the ranks at the tight end position. And with Jacob Harris, the coaching staff finds itself with a lump of NFL quality clay that they can shape and mold however they see fit. Reports from McVay suggest that Harris is incredibly adept and quick at absorbing and learning the Rams role for him.

Eventually, he will need to demonstrate all of that acquired knowledge, and the LA Rams already have the spot reserved for him. The coaches want to add some oomph to the red zone offense, and with running back Cam Akers going down, it will likely need to come from the passing game. Due to the lack of maneuverability, the offense will need to place taller targets into the mix, as well as players who can win contested catches. Harris will do nicely in both categories when he fully develops.

And there’s the rub. The if’s and buts. Jacob Harris is not fully developed. From what we’ve seen in the past, the cards are stacked against Harris to get many snaps in this offense this year. He’s a rookie. He’s very raw. And he is learning a brand new position. But then there is the flip side.

He can be deadly effective as a target in the red zone. Even if he is not a primary target, his presence on the football field will force coverage his way. Besides, will the Matthew-Stafford-Effect buoy his production? Well, wait a darned minute. We said we wouldn’t consider Matthew Stafford in judging Harris’ potential in the Rams’ offense this year. But it’s nearly impossible not to. They have the potential to become a high-scoring tandem this season. So until they prove that they aren’t, why not just go with it for now?
 

Jacobarch

Legend
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
5,050
Name
Jake
Because better tight ends have been drafted in later rounds. It felt like a forced pick for a raw player early in round 2. I think we saw a repeat of forcing a positional need with an early pick this past draft.
Harris? Wasn't he selected in the 4th? That's not exactly reaching for any player tbh.
And the draft is a crapshoot we all know that, or at least we should. How many No.1 over picks end up working out? I'm pretty sure most don't live up to their draft status than do. Anyways, If you're referring to TUTU then I say wait, you can't say a player is drafted too highly when he hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet. I dunno seems like a case of putting the cart before the horse.
 
Last edited:

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
38,503
The best TEs can show a bit early on but utilization and how important they are in the scheme really matters too. Shockey had 74 catches for 894 yards because they fed him the ball. Gronk meanwhile had a more modest 42 for 546 yards. Can you guess which TE is the sole "1k yards as a rookie" guy? You guessed it: Mike Ditka lol.

Re: Harris I suspect he's going to have a high yards per catch too. At least this year. Because I think the Rams will use him to stretch the field. Also there's a lot of weapons in this offense in the passing game so it's unlikely he gets a high catch count. I'm still thinking he'll fall somewhere 500-800 yards which is probably very kool-aidish. But I figure his ceiling of catches in this offense is about 50, and a high yard per average from stretching the field would be around 16, so 50x16=800.

Oh and btw did you know that Ditka averaged 19.2 yards per catch? Kind of surprising isn't it.
 
Last edited:

Billy Baroo

How about a Fresca?
Joined
Jul 18, 2013
Messages
1,210
More of a Nelson Spruce comparison for Harris for me.
This is second Nelson Spruce comp I’ve read here in two days - Jake Funk being the other. Is it because they’re both white or do they play similarly?
 

MauiRam

Rookie
Joined
May 26, 2013
Messages
249
Tavon Austin was clearly faster than most players in college. The problem was, in the NFL everyone is fast. He never adapted. Tutu is in the same boat. Will he adapt to the faster defenses? I don't know. I know I prefer not to make comparisons until it actually happens. I remember a few years ago people compared us to the Eagles dream team and predicted we'd flop because of that. We won 13 games and went to the Superbowl.
The biggest difference between Tavon and Two-2 that I can see is that Tavon never had the fire in his belly that Atwell displays. Austin was never a polished route runner. He was not very good when it came to contested catches. Additionally he was not adept at tracking the long ball. When I have viewed film of Atwell, he fights for contested catches. He is superb at tracking the football. The only comparison that is legit IMO is size.

It ain't the size of the dog, it's the size of the heart/fight ...
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
22,521
Harris? Wasn't he selected in the 4th? That's not exactly reaching for any player tbh.
And the draft is a crapshoot we all know that, or at least we should. How many No.1 over picks end up working out? I'm pretty sure most don't live up to their draft status than do. Anyways, If you're referring to TUTU then I say wait, you can't say a player is drafted too highly when he hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet. I dunno seems like a case of putting the cart before the horse.
Everett
 

…..

Legend
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
5,089
Nelson Spruce was a good reciever. I really liked him and hoped he’d catch on here. He ended having the first 100 yard game in the XFl.

But he doesnt compare to Jacob Harris. Harris is much faster and taller and looks heavier though they are listed the same.

Harris compares more with Calvin Johnson for size and speed

Spruce compares more with Cooper Kupp for sheer hands ability and similar size.

just my opinion.
 

majrleaged

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
4,088
The biggest difference between Tavon and Two-2 that I can see is that Tavon never had the fire in his belly that Atwell displays. Austin was never a polished route runner. He was not very good when it came to contested catches. Additionally he was not adept at tracking the long ball. When I have viewed film of Atwell, he fights for contested catches. He is superb at tracking the football. The only comparison that is legit IMO is size.

It ain't the size of the dog, it's the size of the heart/fight ...
Tevon had boards for hands. Balls right to him would just bounce off his hands. TuTu is a way better football player. Problem is will he hold up. I think they have to be smarter with the type of routes he runs. Keep him on the outside and when he does cut in, because he needs to keep them guessing, make sure there are clearing routes so he has time to make a move and doesn't get his clock cleaned.
 

Loyal

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jul 27, 2010
Messages
30,330
More of a Nelson Spruce comparison for Harris for me.
Duude......Harris isn't our desperate pick for savior like Spruce was in the midst of Rams darkness. We had no apparent options after the savior failed. Harris is just a nice to have development player....
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
38,503
This is second Nelson Spruce comp I’ve read here in two days - Jake Funk being the other. Is it because they’re both white or do they play similarly?
Harris is nothing like Spruce. He's like the anti-Spruce.

Spruce was a technician who was limited athletically. Harris is like a gazelle crossed with a giraffe. Night and day.
 

Soul Surfer

Legend
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
6,565
Name
Charles Mazyck
I'll never understand why Everett was considered a failure. He was a good #2 TE, probably one of the better #2 TE's in the league. Sure he had his ups and downs but what #2 TE doesn't? I think some of the Ramily needs to have a bit of a reality check in knowing that not every player can be the best at their respected position in football.
I expected the first player that Sean McVay would pick would turn out to be a star.
He was not.

Even when we ran two tight-end sets, he was hardly open and therefore not targeted.

I remember too many dropped balls and lackadaisical non-physical downfield blocking.

Color me unimpressed.
 

thirteen28

I like pizza.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 15, 2013
Messages
8,446
Name
Erik
I'll never understand why Everett was considered a failure. He was a good #2 TE, probably one of the better #2 TE's in the league. Sure he had his ups and downs but what #2 TE doesn't? I think some of the Ramily needs to have a bit of a reality check in knowing that not every player can be the best at their respected position in football.

I wouldn't consider him an outright failure, but I don't think he got to his ceiling with us either, not by a pretty fair margin. Higs was a 6th rounder, and I doubt anyone will argue against the proposition that he's a better, more reliable TE than Everett ever became. He was a good athlete and good once he had the ball in his hands, but he wasn't consistent and his game had a lot of holes in it *cough blocking cough*.
 
Last edited:

Soul Surfer

Legend
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Messages
6,565
Name
Charles Mazyck
Because better tight ends have been drafted in later rounds. It felt like a forced pick for a raw player early in round 2. I think we saw a repeat of forcing a positional need with an early pick this past draft.
I actually have more respect for a scrappy UDFA like Mundt who practices so hard and blocks so well that they end up having to keep him over a second round draft pick like Everett that had so much potential athletically but ended up giving me a case of the yawns overall.
 

Jacobarch

Legend
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
5,050
Name
Jake
I wouldn't consider him an outright failure, but I don't think he got to his ceiling with us either, not by a pretty fair margin. Higs was a 6th rounder, and I doubt anyone will argue against the proposition that he's a better, more reliable TE than Everett ever became. He was a good athlete and good once he had the ball in his hands, but he wasn't consistent and his game had a lot of holes in it *cough blocking cough*.
Hence why he was a no2 TE I never said he was great I'm just say he wasn't awful either. I seem to remember him making a game winning TD catch in one of the greatest games in the history of the NFL. You're also right he hasn't hit his ceiling imo but he's close to it. He's only going to ever be a no2. Regardless where mcVay drafted him
 

Flint

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,608
Tavon Austin was clearly faster than most players in college. The problem was, in the NFL everyone is fast. He never adapted. Tutu is in the same boat. Will he adapt to the faster defenses? I don't know. I know I prefer not to make comparisons until it actually happens. I remember a few years ago people compared us to the Eagles dream team and predicted we'd flop because of that. We won 13 games and went to the Superbowl.
Many times in college Tavon was the fastest guy on the field and he was often wide open. He didn’t need to run especially good routes, he didn’t need to have great hands, he just needed to be fast and he was. He never got much better as a wr but he still had value in McVay’s jet motion game. Unfortunately he also went down if you got a hand on him which wasn’t great.
From all accounts Tutu has good hands and tracks the ball well in addition to being very very fast. McVay has been looking for someone to provide this skillset, Cooks didn’t have great hands and wasn’t elusive, and we saw what happened when they tried to do without last year. So Tutu gets his shot, except right now he can play some and watch how a guy like Jackson gets it done.
It’s good that they have more than one guy that has deep speed, just the threat should open up some of the congestion from last year.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,143
Name
mojo
The biggest difference between Tavon and Two-2 that I can see is that Tavon never had the fire in his belly that Atwell displays. Austin was never a polished route runner. He was not very good when it came to contested catches. Additionally he was not adept at tracking the long ball. When I have viewed film of Atwell, he fights for contested catches. He is superb at tracking the football. The only comparison that is legit IMO is size.

It ain't the size of the dog, it's the size of the heart/fight ...
That, and Tavon drank from the Fisher cup of offense with coaches who improved and developed no one.

Tutu will get solid coaching here, where many guys have developed and flourished.
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,269
Duude......Harris isn't our desperate pick for savior like Spruce was in the midst of Rams darkness. We had no apparent options after the savior failed. Harris is just a nice to have development player....
I have high hopes for Harris. I am tempering my enthusiasm. I am not expecting him to contribute much until year 2 or 3. (Note: same expectation I have for Rochelle, Atwell, B Brown, E Jones). If he shines sooner I will be a very happy camper.
 

dang

Legend
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
7,269
This is second Nelson Spruce comp I’ve read here in two days - Jake Funk being the other. Is it because they’re both white or do they play similarly?
My response was in comparing Harris to Everett. If everyone remembers Spruce came out of nowhere to shine in TC only to crash back to earth. I don’t expect Harris to do the same but I’m tempering my expectations for this year at least.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,733
The biggest difference between Tavon and Two-2 that I can see is that Tavon never had the fire in his belly that Atwell displays. Austin was never a polished route runner. He was not very good when it came to contested catches. Additionally he was not adept at tracking the long ball. When I have viewed film of Atwell, he fights for contested catches. He is superb at tracking the football. The only comparison that is legit IMO is size.

It ain't the size of the dog, it's the size of the heart/fight ...
The main difference I see is that Tavon was never an actual WR imo. He was a RB that was playing WR but never really had good hands, didn't fight for contested catches, and wasn't a good route runner. And all the jukes he put on college players weren't going to consistently work on NFL players, so sadly there wasn't much left for him after that.

I think Tutu could be what Tavon was supposed to be from what I've seen so far.
 

jjab360

Legend
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
6,733
Tevon had boards for hands. Balls right to him would just bounce off his hands. TuTu is a way better football player. Problem is will he hold up. I think they have to be smarter with the type of routes he runs. Keep him on the outside and when he does cut in, because he needs to keep them guessing, make sure there are clearing routes so he has time to make a move and doesn't get his clock cleaned.
I'd have to agree, that one hard tackle he took in the preseason game seemed like a casual collision that sent him flying lol