No coincidence. I fully believe McVay is a future HOF coach. We are just witnessing the start of itJust remembering McVay going to talk to Donald during his holdout, and said holdout ending quite soon afterwards.
Maybe just coincidence, but maybe not.
If anything, McVay would be a hell of a recruiter at the college level.
View: https://twitter.com/imrknapp/status/976510231495790592?s=21
Also just came across this.. can’t confirm the source and not sure if reliable, but hopefully deal is announced tonight! (Mind you, this tweet was this morning)
Nailed the NRC & Sullivan amounts, I’m gonna stick to my prediction and say 12 mill high end per year with up to 3 mill in incentives (ie pro bowl, playoffs, super bowl appearance etc). It’ll either be a one year or three for sure!
No coincidence. I fully believe McVay is a future HOF coach. We are just witnessing the start of it
A lot of people have compared McVay to Chucky in his mannerisms and speaking style. But the more I get to know him, the more I see McVay as a confident and sincere version of what Gruden was supposed to be. Gruden seems to be more schtick than anything else.
He must be seething about this Suh situation. Cross-eyed, creased brow, just contorting his mouth like crazy. I said before: I believe McVay is the primary reason for the timing of Grudens comeback. I believe he is jealous of the young upstart. Wants to show him a thing or two.
I don’t have anything against Gruden. I just see a guy jealous and with wrong motives.
That usually doesn’t end well.
MaybeAm I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if the sign Suh?
I could care less about Suh himself. But he will make our defense better so it'd be nice if he signed. Think I'd prefer Hankins as he's younger and probably cheaper but Suh is a big signing. Even if he is a puke.Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?
Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?
On paper, this defense has the chance to rival Denver of 2015, Seattle of 2013, Tampa of 2002 and Baltimore of 2000. But paper doesn’t win on the field.I'm thinking you might not have a pulse.
Rams become the top defense in the league by adding Suh, even with the holes at LB. They could get consistent pressure rushing 4, maybe even 3 guys at times. They could get QB pressure running a dime defense.
I don't think I can even remember a defense having the best DL and DB in the league.
Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?
Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?
Really! You don't care one way or another? Oh please tell me dear god you know which direction to put a football helmet on?Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?
I am cautiously enthusiastic until I see the terms. Not as excited if its a one year rental for $14M. If that happens I would have liked to see Rams kick the tires on Hankins for something like 3 years/$8M per yr.Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?
RE: Bradford... With the information at the time, I was 100% Bradford.
Hindsight; I’d probably have traded the pick for as many picks possible.
A lot of people have compared McVay to Chucky in his mannerisms and speaking style. But the more I get to know him, the more I see McVay as a confident and sincere version of what Gruden was supposed to be. Gruden seems to be more schtick than anything else.
He must be seething about this Suh situation. Cross-eyed, creased brow, just contorting his mouth like crazy. I said before: I believe McVay is the primary reason for the timing of Grudens comeback. I believe he is jealous of the young upstart. Wants to show him a thing or two.
I don’t have anything against Gruden. I just see a guy jealous and with wrong motives.
That usually doesn’t end well.
Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?
Am I The only one who doesn't care one way or another if they sign Suh?