Legatron4
Legend
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2013
- Messages
- 9,489
- Name
- Wes
Not sure I like the use of the word “worse” in this situation. You can just say Wilson is better.Rams fans do realize that, right now, Goff is worse than Wilson with a (MUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCH) better supporting cast, right?
But painting some numbers in a certain light, Goff is right there with Wilson....which means whatever Seattle just paid him, we will have to pay Goff - so why are fans saying that this will cost them? Won't it cost us too?
Goff also threw for 1200 yards more and had a RB score 17 touchdowns. Oh, and Wilson had the #1 rush offense. So I’m not sure the better supporting cast thing holds weight in this situation.
Another thing, Wilson wouldn’t be a good fit in this system. He likes to do his own thing too much. But I’ll take Goff any day of the week including Sunday. He still has a potential 12 years left. Wilson might have 4.