You have your opinion I have mine. Facts of the matter is each CBA has been agreed to by the owners and players. They're in this together tied at the hip. If something was so important to the Union they could have done something about it. Their actions or lack of have much more impact than what they tell the media they want or wanted. Actions speak so much louder than words.
Of course and I respect your opinion.
As for the statement that the owners and players are tied at the hip, that's simply not true.
CTE has the potential to RUIN the sport. There are schools around the country abandoning their football programs because they can't afford the insurance. Mom's are not only withholding their kids from football but from soccer and hockey as well.
Moreover, the players wanted more info about CTE.
And yet, the owners don't care about the sport, so even if it's for their own betterment or enrichment, they REFUSE to do anything with respect to the CBA unless they can get concessions on something.
Some of it is not a matter of opinion.
There are some facts. (and no, I'm not defending the NFLPA because I think they've been poorly led and have not fully been about all of the players' health and welfare)
There have been multiple lawsuits from players and the NFLPA.
The owners have made it very clear that they are willing to have a work stoppage in order to make more billions versus, Heaven FORBID, share revenues like they do in the NFL.
Moreover, the owners, themselves and through their proxy, the Commissioner, were willing to lie and obstruct in order to prevent THE TRUTH getting out. The NFL had causal data linking concussive and subconcussive impacts to CTE and they PURPOSEFULLY withheld that data.
Now, how in Heaven's name can the NFLPA be complicit when they repeatedly asked and had to sue in federal court to obtain this information???
Are there instances where the NFLPA and the owners have made bad decisions together? Yeah, and the current CBA is a mess they will have a terrible time fixing.
That said, whether it be player discipline, "drug" testing (and moreover the LACK of differentiation between addictive/psychoactive drugs like alchohol, marijuana or opiates versus actual PEDs like Adderall, steroids or HGH is a huge problem that isn't going away), refereeing, or any number of other issues, it's NOT that they're all the same part of the problem
I'm fine with respecting those who think Goodell has done a good job, especially those that define the Commissioner as a glorified EVP of Business Development. If the sole criteria is to bring in more money, then undeniably he's been successful. So was Michael Eisner at Disney if that's the sole criteria. But, as we saw with Eisner, he ultimately nearly destroyed the brand.
Goodell is on that same path.
Such statements like the NFL and NFLPA are joined at the hip cannot be made without ignoring a TON of actual information, data, and facts.
So, on some things, I'll respectfully disagree with you. On things where there are controverting facts, I'll point that out. And if new information corrects me, I'll be more than happy to assimilate that information and go from there.
Not everything is opinion. Facts are facts or at least they used to be.
And with all of that, if anyone thinks Goodell has done a good job, then God Bless.