I gave it a C, would have been minus had that been an option. All we needed to do was nail our first pick and I could/would have gone higher. I just cannot see drafting a pure gadget player when full time starting contributors were sitting on the board. There is absolutely no chance Atwell is a starting full time WR for us, and that severely caps his ceiling IMO. Did we have a lot of holes to fill? Perhaps not, but improving a position by selecting a cheap (contract) rookie is the way you improve you team. Particularly a team like us who has cap issues. Honestly, when looking at other teams draft results, I feel we had one of, if not the, worst draft class in the league (BTW, Brugler had us ranged 31 of 32nd, 2nd worst class to Texans). Sure, we didn't have has as much draft capital as most to start, but, most teams did draft what are perceived to me potential starters to improve their team.
I hope and I pray that Tutu is the next DJax and can put on like 10 lbs, but, as OldSchool eluded to above, those 3 other small guys are not good or productive at all. So we gambled on a extreme outlier with our most valuable pick. I'm sorry, I cannot get behind that kind of thinking when we are this close to SB contenders. Rest of the draft was ok, not what I'd consider fantastic, but did love a few of the guys we drafted.