ottoman89
Busch Light slammin, hog farmin, Iowa boy.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 5,165
- Name
- Josh Otto
Agree. Our DBs are BAD without him. In a passing league, we'll get eaten up. And considering he's the only physical guy we have, we're going to get even further smashed by SF and other physical teams. I hate every ounce of this idea of trading Ramsey.I am talking about play on the field. Just think how bad our secondary would be without Ramsey...
In terms of drama, which is what I think you are referring to, he has been a model citizen while on the Rams.
And yes, he has a LOT of trade value (estimated 1st + 4th, from what I understand). And yes, he would be in contention for HOF consideration, especially now that he has a ring.
The problem is that we will not be in contention to win the NFC West without a healthy JR + AD. By trading away either you are essentially entering a rebuild - aka a bad product on the field - aka a fucking clown show for years to come.
Today, we are still in "the window" to be in contention (barring injury and assuming a re-built OL, which is in the realm of possibility).
Where do our viewpoints differ?
This defense is immensely worse without him.
If he wants a new deal, give it to him. He can rotate to Safety in a year or so and finish it out there. But getting rid of him sets our defense back so much.
We'll go from a sketchy pass rush because Raheem plays our DBs 27 yards back every play, to sketchy pass rush because our DBs are burnt toast, and I mean pitch black burnt.