Going back and looking you're right they were in cover 1 most of the time that we had a back in the
backfield and in my opinion, that's where we should have kept them.
Here is a pitch against cover1 and a 12yd gain.
I think we may have ran 2 or 3 pitches to this side. all of them were possitive
But no, we have to go back to the empty backfield crap again and again.
There's nothing wrong with the empty backfield, but there has to be better balance,
especially when you're no having success from the empty set.
We did see some cover0 with a back in the backfield and a tight end, but not near as much as cover1
Another example of cover0. The deep defender is not playing deep zone, but appears to be spying
RB. And you could run this without a back in the backfield.
Jet sweep to woods for a TD. Attacking the perimeter quickly.
I guess the whole point of my post is that we did a shitty job of using our run game with
purpose. McVay was hard headed sticking with the empty set way to much.
Even after it was evident Goff was not able to run it with any kind of consistency.
Most of that was on Goff, but it was also on McVay for not having balance in his playcalling.
Getting Henderson outside. Better yet just running the damn ball.
Our run game potential is through the roof and we are not using it the way we should
Between Henderson, Akers and Malcom we should be running the ball 40 times a game.