Rams Select KT Leveston (OT/OG, Kansas State) With 254th pick.

[So Ram]

Yes, Tyler Davis. He's been rounding out nicely.
Brennan Jackson... he could be a guy that allows us some flexibility when it comes time to negotiate w/ the Fearsome 5. He's a big kid & looked the part in pre-season, but not sure what he's done w/ his limited snaps. Omar is a guy who did a LOT with his opportunities & is now starting in place of Reeder.

Well for everyone stating Speights.I saw #35 in there a lot more than expected ???
Don’t know why that is,but I’d say Rosenboom has taking more of the MLB role ,or at least calling more of the plays if you’re talking about the LBers ???Inguess I haven’t watch enough of the games close enough?
I saw Whiterspoon get beat for a TD,but still think there has to be a player in that passing lane if he is in zone coverage?

 

[PARAM]

Well for everyone stating Speights.I saw #35 in there a lot more than expected ???

Really? He played 4 snaps. 4 of 76 defensive snaps. 4. So I assume you didn't expect to see him at all AND 4 is a relatively large number to you. Or you must have mistaken another number for 35 a number of times (no pun intended). FWIW, Rozeboom had 49 snaps (64%) and Speights had 42 (55%).

 

[Londoner]

Really? He played 4 snaps. 4 of 76 defensive snaps. 4. So I assume you didn't expect to see him at all AND 4 is a relatively large number to you. Or you must have mistaken another number for 35 a number of times (no pun intended). FWIW, Rozeboom had 49 snaps (64%) and Speights had 42 (55%).

Or he was drunk and seeing double.

Or he was stoned and saw Hummel spinning around him infinitely.

 

[PARAM]

Or he was drunk and seeing double.

Or he was stoned and saw Davis spinning around him infinitely.

I don't know him. Have read his posts loosely. But maybe he was seeing double and has groundhog day disease.

 

[So Ram]

Really? He played 4 snaps. 4 of 76 defensive snaps. 4. So I assume you didn't expect to see him at all AND 4 is a relatively large number to you. Or you must have mistaken another number for 35 a number of times (no pun intended). FWIW, Rozeboom had 49 snaps (64%) and Speights had 42 (55%).

Well the the 2 knees still didn’t equate to Rosenbom.Yes I didn’t expect to see #35 on the field.
11 tackles vs 7 ??

Still Speights has been solid,but he did get taken back a few times past the marker(1st down.) His solo tackles were impressive & he is only getting better.
-Rosenboom gets zero Credit around here though.Reeders days are probably done as a Ram.

 

[PARAM]

Well the the 2 knees still didn’t equate to Rosenbom.Yes I didn’t expect to see #35 on the field.
11 tackles vs 7 ??

I'm assuming you're talking about Speights (42) and Hummel"s (4) snaps not adding up to Rosenboom's (49). And/or the tackles those two made (7) adding up to Rozeboom's (11). I have to assume because I don't know WTF "knees" means. I would suggest "solo" tackles are more important than "total" tackles and Speights had 5 to Rozeboom's 4 on less snaps. It's nice to have a guy 'assist' with tackles but it's more impressive when he gets it all by himself IMHO.

 

[So Ram]

I'm assuming you're talking about Speights (42) and Hummel"s (4) snaps not adding up to Rosenboom's (49). And/or the tackles those two made (7) adding up to Rozeboom's (11). I have to assume because I don't know WTF "knees" means. I would suggest "solo" tackles are more important than "total" tackles and Speights had 5 to Rozeboom's 4 on less snaps. It's nice to have a guy 'assist' with tackles but it's more impressive when he gets it all by himself IMHO.

True - agree,but I did notice when he actually made the tackle as well. Speights is just starting out,so I’ll assume he’ll only get better. I’m not going to bash a guy on a win,and he brings so much to the short distance plays(run D).He is a thumper & a type of Inside LBer The Rams need against Philly.
-A Sunday Night game will be on display.Hooefully The Rams can stop there win streak & start one if there own.