Totally got that. I was saying maybe close, but not exactly the same. Maybe the Rams had a little bit of the high-speed wobbles on Watkins, which kept them from plunking down the big money. As compared to Cooks, which they seem to be in love with. So, I was just slightly differing with you as "exact same" vs. "close to same, but not quite".The point I was trying to make is that we were in a exact same situation with Watkins being on the last year of his contract yet they didn't sign him but they did make it a priority to sign Cooks.
Sammy wasn't feeling it as strongly for the Rams. It showed in some of the play we all complained about.Interesting that they would sign him before he played one down for the Rams but did not do the same for Sammy Watkins.
They may not have been feeling it as strongly for Sammy.
I am going to miss LAChamp if this is trueI liked champ too but I’m pretty sure that “503 and his cronies” post was the quintessential final straw, especially when you’re more or less on “double secret probation” Not a real shining moment, I cringed the moment i read it.
You call out a mod, especially when you’re fresh out of a “timeout” and you sorta corner said mod into a no brainer
Then again, maybe i have this all wrong
Oh, and utterly thrilled with the Cooks extension:yay:
The point I was trying to make is that we were in a exact same situation with Watkins being on the last year of his contract yet they didn't sign him but they did make it a priority to sign Cooks.
If I had to payout max contracts for their respective positional costs it would be:
Ideally QB, LT, CB's, DE or pass rushing LB in a 3-4 , DT. Then Center, Guard.
Then WR/TE, MLB, RB.
Each situation is different depending on Rookie Contracts a team has.
I might want to reup Peters Contract next year or Suh, or save that money to replace Saffold or the right side of the Oline. Not to mention the Donald deal.
To be fair Cooks had hall of Famers throwing to him too
Typical idiot uninformed comments from randoms on the intrawebsFound these comments from a yahoo article on Cook's signing today:
JJ Jingleheimerschmidt
"Seems like a reach. He was good on the Patriots but not that good.
Izzie
"Okay, so if he's extending on a Rams contract one question. Why does the picture with this article show him in a Patriots uniform?"
Matt
Rams didn't learn from the Tavon Austin contract obviously lol
Dammit, you're right. Do you know how long I've been searching to prove I was right, only to find out I was wrong. Sorry about that. I hate being wrong, Dammit! You'd think I'd be use to bring wrong because I'm wrong a lot!
Now to deal with your question regarding watching the patriots. I'm a football junkie, the NFL, college football, and I still go watch high school games for the school I played football and basketball for.
So on Thursday, Sunday, and Monday I'm glued to the tv watching football, which means I watch all the teams, and the patriots are always on more than any other team.
Knowing the Rams were trying to get Cooks last year I paid closer attention to him, and it became obvious that Cooks needed to play on a team where the QB had a strong arm, so I was ecstatic when the Rams traded for him.
Did I tell you I hate being wrong? DAMMIT!
Fear of only another 1 year rental WR was the only thing not making this offseason a grand slam to the moon. Now, it is complete. And as mentioned, leaves open a lot of doors the next couple of off seasons as far as tags go without having to worry about Cooks for it possibly. So have it free for others now.
QB is obvious. LT I’ll give you. Even CB and DE.
Center and guard- $15M a year? Seriously?
For the number of plays they are actually involved in, I agree WRs are overrated and overpaid. But for a special one, especially when you need that “real” # 1 receiver, which Cooks has proven to be, I’m cool with it.