- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 49,214
- Name
- Burger man
Not saying they would give up on him. Not saying it's likely. But teams do stupid shit sometimes. So I'd call them and try to shake him loose while they're riding the high of trading up to that first pick.Why would Carolina sell him on the cheap, or give up on him at all? His contract is peanuts, non guaranteed as well. Cost them a 3rd rounder last year and surely would be worth having on their bench if the rookie is struggling
My bad, the way I read your post I thought Carolina had waived him or openly put him on market. I agree on both him and Mills, if either shook freeNot saying they would give up on him. Not saying it's likely. But teams do stupid shit sometimes. So I'd call them and try to shake him loose while they're riding the high of trading up to that first pick.
There are some others that would apply to as well. The Texans for example will probably draft a QB and they have Mills as a holdover. I don't know that they would move him. I don't know that they appreciate the things he has done well in his limited time as a starter. But I'd call them too and try to shake him loose. He's on that list for me.
Can't argue with that!Frankly, I hope it'll be Baker. I think a whole off-season with McVay and Stafford would set him up for GREAT success with us after Stafford retires.
I think that if there was any possibility that Stafford only had 1 season left, they'd cut bait right now.Frankly, I hope it'll be Baker. I think a whole off-season with McVay and Stafford would set him up for GREAT success with us after Stafford retires.
Looked like on OTC that no matter what, we're screwed with his number.I think that if there was any possibility that Stafford only had 1 season left, they'd cut bait right now.
His contract is about to trigger an additional 57 million in guaranteed money, including his entire 2024 salary and option bonus that will pay him 38 million next year.
Not screwed at all.Looked like on OTC that no matter what, we're screwed with his number.
If he's 2021 version, not at all. I'm a massive Stafford fan. He's already my favorite Rams QB of all time.Not screwed at all.
Having 2021 version of Matt Stafford for the next couple seasons is hardly being screwed.
And if the Rams didnt believe that 100%, he'd be cut. PERIOD
100% who I'm gunning for as well later in the draft.Clayton Tune Quarterback Houston | NFL Draft Profile & Scouting Report
Rating: 82.3 Rank: #9 Forty: 4.64 Clayton Tune is a super-experienced prospect who has put up huge numbers during five years at Houston. He is a great leader with elite intangibles and an i...www.nfldraftbuzz.com
Honestly I am worried about him. I am worried whether he can meet that contract obligation. The guy has taken a beating over his career and has his ring now.Not screwed at all.
Having 2021 version of Matt Stafford for the next couple seasons is hardly being screwed.
And if the Rams didnt believe that 100%, he'd be cut. PERIOD
this is a bit of circular logic.If he's 2021 version, not at all. I'm a massive Stafford fan. He's already my favorite Rams QB of all time.
I'm referring to IF he's not himself anymore, and IF, he's not going to be himself again. He's a shell and what we saw towards the end of his '22 season.. were screwed with his cap number.
Not to mention I have zero faith our OL will protect him in '23 which is why we NEED to invest in a top backup.
this is a bit of circular logic.
Spending significant cap space on what the top backup will cost will prevent the Rams from investing in the o-line