- Joined
- Dec 5, 2011
- Messages
- 800
But he didn't show McVay enough to convince him.Paul showed enough during the Cowboys game to convince me he's worth at least developing
If he’s legitimately worse than Reeder. And little hope he could elevate above Reeder by end of next year then he just wasn’t ANY good. Hard to believe but could be a cold hard fact.So he went unclaimed and the Rams still didn't sign him back. And remember the Rams generally pay top dollar for players they want on their practice squad so they usually win in a bidding war. So this, along with McVay's comments yesterday, tells me they did not like something about him. This just smells like that classic "player got the coach speak as they politely threw him out the door" treatment that seems to happen once or twice a season.
If that's the case I'm fine with losing Pooh. If he's not a fit he's not a fit. Whether it's locker room or physical doesn't matter.
The Rams had 4 cut players not clear waivers and land on a team's 53 (league high). Willie Lampkin went to Eagles 53.Did any of those guys get on a 53?
No.
So.. fucked themselves? Come on.
Idk. I’m not plugged into the Twitter verse. Can anyone elaborate on this?What did his dad say? Am I the only one who missed it?
Correct. Its one thing to get out played. Another to give away the game on a mental mistake.All I know is, when it comes to Reeder the team disagrees with the fans. They think he adds value to the team. Fans didn't like Shelton over Limmer. Another case where the team disagrees with the fans. Rams are in win now mode. They have more trust in the experienced guys. Less likely to make a big mistake at the wrong time. Like when Stafford got sacked in the playoff game essentially ending the rally. That was an assignment mistake.
Was his tape that good? I watched him in every game. I wouldnt say it was all that good.Our coaching staff clearly did not like him. Since his tape was good, it must be a maturity concern.
We can't have that kind of thinking around here sir.But he didn't show McVay enough to convince him.
And it's the coach's opinion that matters.
It was Dolac over Paul. Not reeder over Paul. McVay already alluded to the fact that Paul couldn’t play special teams and the Rams weren’t keeping two rookies out of four guys at inside linebacker.It's not that we lost Paul that I am upset about. It's about keeping Reeder on the team instead of Paul that bothers me.
I just want Reeder nowhere close to the team.
And Paul in game 1 looked to have some ability in that game. More so than Reeder ever showed.
But then again, I am just an armchair fan whose knowledge of the game is nothing compared to McVay and Snead.
definitely got the same vibe, I new he wasn't coming back at all. I wonder what did or said that got him in trouble? If Pooh can't buy into the team culture the Rams have then I'm glad he's gone.That's my guess, when McVay hit the "I wish him the best" line in yesterday's press conference I thought "uh oh, Pooh done pissed someone off" and figured this would be the result.
He didn't say anything directly on twitter. He started posting a lot of bible quotes that implicated that he was going to be cut, and that led to the speculation that occurred before cuts were officially announced.What did his dad say? Am I the only one who missed it?