Go wentz
Ah piss
YepI am goingo out on a limb here and guessing wrong thread? LOL
I highly doubt, that a coach is going to pick a guy that gives us the best chance to lose.Or it could be just like McVay said. It was a close competition and Sloman pulled ahead in the final week or two.
And it always cracks me up people throwing out the hypothetical costing us a win. Like you point out people were pissed we let GZ go yet his missed FG last year kept us from the playoffs. It honestly looks like no matter what this kid does it won't be good enough for some people.
Except Sloman per some around here. I think one of the common themes was he went with Sam just because of his alma mater. There were a few other less flattering suggestions on how/why we chose our kicker it was very funny.I highly doubt, that a coach is going to pick a guy that gives us the best chance to lose.
Some need to get over GZs powerful legs.Except Sloman per some around here. I think one of the common themes was he went with Sam just because of his alma mater. There were a few other less flattering suggestions on how/why we chose our kicker it was very funny.
I agree 100% but you know how it is. Some have an axe to grind and won't let it go. For now I'm just enjoying the entertainment.Some need to get over GZs powerful legs.
Gzs power isn't the norm.
Greg is struggling again this year, anyway.
Sloman is splitting the uprights. He also kicks a straight ball.
I know many were concerned about the shallow line drives he was kicking the first week.
It appears to me that he now has more lift on the ball during his FG kicks.
I hope the young kid keeps it up and continues to build confidence.
How can you take anyone seriously with a name like Rodrigo Blankenship?There is always that one that got away
View attachment 39636
View attachment 39635
View attachment 39633View attachment 39634
Since I’ve been paid by NFL scouts for 17 seasons now Idk how on This green Earth Les didn’t see this UDFA.
That's the only reason to take him seriously besides the glasses!lolHow can you take anyone seriously with a name like Rodrigo Blankenship?
70% ?? Are you suggesting that 70% is a good thing?You mean the guy that was 50% for us and followed that up with a year at 70%? This just proves we should stick it out with Sloman so thank you for that.
I understand you like the guy, but you said no matter what he does as if he has actually done somethingIt honestly looks like no matter what this kid does it won't be good enough for some people.