If you're the better team, you want it to be decided by the players, not by the refs.
Have some of you actually looked at his stats, or are you just following the conspiracy theory crowd? Road teams have won 50% of the games he has reffed this year. That's about as fair as you can get.
Were any of those teams the Rams?
I also want to see the game decided by the players, not the refs. But if the players violate the rules and the refs do nothing, then the refs are deciding the game by allowing that to happen.
Let's say the Saints hit Goff late in almost every passing play, driving him into the ground with their full body weight. Goff gets injured on one of these bogus please, but no glad it's ever called. Who decided the game there? The refs. They could have stopped it earlier, but chose not to.
Or let's say their guard false starts a lot in an attempt to get ahead of Donald and uses that advantage to neutralize him (or slow him down significantly more than normal). The refs let it go. Who's helping decide the game there? The refs, because they would be allowing illegal activities that help one team over the other.
The game should be played fairly. The refs are there to ensure that happens. Otherwise, they ARE deciding the game by allowing penalties to happen without being called.