bluecoconuts
Legend
- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,073
I'm just wondering why you didn't bring up Oakland. That was a valid case. SD does not have a gripe after 14 years. Raiders are the team that's really getting the shaft but you didn't mention them. It's whatever.
What about Oakland? You're saying that driving between LA and San Diego is no big deal, so they keep those markets, I'm saying it is. If the San Diego market is lost, why would the Oakland market not be lost? Like I said, if they want to move two teams to LA then they lose two markets. Since San Diego isn't two markets, then obviously the other would be Oakland in that scenario.
That may be true, but we don't really know which site the NFL covets more. I heard somewhere that the NFL tried to buy the Carson site before.
Yes, but they also determined it wasn't good for the NFL. They've also tried to buy the Inglewood site as well, but it didn't happen. They've tried to buy both and had concerns with both.