I'll confess - I'm originally from the upper midwest. Used to hate the LA Rams; they had beautiful weather and celebrities; not fair they have good sports teams, too. Used to love when the LA Rams would play the Vikings in Minnesota; or when the lost to the Bears in Soldier Field, and their punter whiffed when a gust of wind blew the football.
But the GSOT - who wouldn't fall in love with that? I'm not sure how I'd feel if the Rams went to Inglewood, and another franchise came to St. Louis. I think I'd stay a Rams fan AND be a fan of the St. Louis team; but if the Rams went to LA and there was NO team here? Ugh. I'd hate that.
I see some people dissing St. Louis because they didn't want to approve a $700 million makeover of the Dome; but now are willing to pay more for a new stadium. The problem with that theory is St. Louis hopes to repurpose the dome as part of the convention center; so they'd have that asset, AND a new stadium - two for one. Plus the new stadium fits perfectly with the current downtown reorganization plan; making the Riverfront the centerpiece of the city; similar to how Chicago uses the Lakefront as its front yard.
I keep hoping the NFL is sufficiently public-relations-savvy that they realize they can't let this mad rush to LA be merely a money grab; there has to be some coherence to the plan; some recognition that far more NFL franchises are located in cities similar to St. Louis, than in cities similar to LA.
Speaking for myself - but as a St. Louisan, I'll stay a Rams fan first and foremost, so long as St. Louis is "okay". New stadium and ANY NFL franchise, I'm fine. Then I can focus on what's best for the Rams.