- Joined
- Jun 1, 2013
- Messages
- 7,650
- Name
- Scott
Yeah, but the team trading for him will want to talk to him so they know he wants to be there. So yes, he has say.They dont need his approval to trade him. Fact.
Talk about ignorant
Yeah, but the team trading for him will want to talk to him so they know he wants to be there. So yes, he has say.They dont need his approval to trade him. Fact.
Talk about ignorant
Again, just adding to the point that in his position, the threat of retirement is not a viable form of leverageYeah, some teams do, some don't. It doesn't seem very Rams-likey to go after him for that but if things got contentious, who knows.
Tell that to Jake PlummerYeah, but the team trading for him will want to talk to him so they know he wants to be there. So yes, he has say.
Having Mayfield was fun for what it was but I think his work with the Bucs with two good coordinators shows that what McVay did with him wasn't quite special in itself. Mayfield is a good but limited QB who got screwed by Cleveland while injured and went to siberia for half a year in Carolina.Pick one: Spark. Fight. Winning. 2nd tier QB at much cheaper rate.
And please note I much prefer keeping Stafford for 2 more years and Rams being an NFC contender in 2025.
Let's talk about the tight ends in this draft class!Not much else to talk about though these days
I think it's a fair assumption. He liked what Wolford could provide as a runner and said so.I assume McVay wants Stafford to be his QB. However, he also is smart enough to look at the NFL landscape and see that all 4 QBs in the conference finals this year were mobile QBs that can take off and run to keep a drive alive. Mahomes being the least aggressive runner and who led the least explosive offense of the 4.
In fact, in the playoffs Stafford was the only pure pocket QB who won a playoff game this year. Goff, Darnold, Wilson, and Love, the other mostly pocket QB's all lost.
So he has to figure he can win with that added dimension and probably is looking forward to developing a QB with that skillset.
Yes, I know making assumptions, but that's what we do.
Get what done ? It’s on Stafford.Stafford is not going anywhere, and I think we all know it just stop all the drama and get the shit done already.
Just giving you an example that it happens. "What one player is willing to do has zero bearing" is an amusing statement.So your argument is using another player that isn't Stafford? That's laughable in itself. No one is talking about Gronk. What one player is willing to do has zero bearing on Stafford's intentions. Once again, his wife is actually on record saying they are ok with a trade. Lmao at anyone thinking he's retiring. I'll just wait to hear what hear whar team he plays for this year.
Never thought it about like that. If we ever had to "waste" a season reloading this could actually very funny as fuck to watch play out. After getting an earful from McVay after a red zone interception I think it would be funny as hell to watch him quit on his team, walk off the field with McVay yelling at him, and leave the damn game for good. Then McVay inserts Kyle McChord, 3rd draft pick) and we don't lose the rest of the year.McVay and Rodgers would be like watching a car crash. Morbidly fun I guess but over very quickly.
I don't think I said that... I never used the word "morbidly". So just saying that was a misquote. Must have tried to quote someone else.Never thought it about like that. If we ever had to "waste" a season reloading this could actually very funny as fuck to watch play out. After getting an earful from McVay after a red zone interception I think it would be funny as hell to watch him quit on his team, walk off the field with McVay yelling at him, and leave the damn game for good. Then McVay inserts Kyle McChord, 3rd draft pick) and we don't lose the rest of the year.
I too believe he'll stay. I also doubt most QBs care about old Stafford setting the market unless they are old QBs themselves. Being young definitely has it advantages of securing a better contract if the talent level is the same. Hope they settle this sooner than later regardless of what happens.Just giving you an example that it happens. "What one player is willing to do has zero bearing" is an amusing statement.
When "one" player accepts a salary that is super high or low - it helps establish the market. "What one player is willing to do" is actually quite significant when it comes to pro sports.
Plus none of this argument matters anyway because he likely stays.
Yeah, I think my IQ dropped about 6 pts after watching it...I'm glad I never watch these shows