He literally said he's not retiring and believes he has a lot left in the tank. His wife is on record saying she's ok with an adventure, he wants to feel wanted, and respected (paid). As CGI said, this all started because he wants to be paid. Retiring kills that reasoning so that thinking makes zero sense. Any team that acquires him will also try to lure free agents big time (probably successfully too) as his years left to play aren't many. I'm still laughing at the fact that anyone believes he'll just pick up his ball and go home lolYou think he would go play anywhere? doesn't matter how shitty they are - he will just suit up and get his ass handed to him with no chance of winning?
Stop and think about it - he would say no thanks and walk away.
He gets nothing as well. He said he wants to play and he would leave a lot of money on the table.If the Rams trade Stafford, he is going to get to basically pick the team. If he doesn’t like the Rams trade partner, he retires, and we get nothing in return but a nasty dead cap hit.
Not much else to talk about though these daysGet your popcorn ready. No one on this board knows how this will play out.
He literally said he's not retiring and believes he has a lot left in the tank. His wife is on record saying she's ok with an adventure, he wants to feel wanted, and respected (paid). As CGI said, this all started because he wants to be paid. Retiring kills that reasoning so that thinking makes zero sense. Any team that acquires him will also try to lure free agents big time (probably successfully too) as his years left to play aren't many. I'm still laughing at the fact that anyone believes he'll just pick up his ball and go home lol
![]()
Lol clueless as usual?Clueless as usual
He can retire if he wants, but the trade is still valid and he would not only make $0, he could be forced to pay back some of his signing bonus.
So your argument is using another player that isn't Stafford? That's laughable in itself. No one is talking about Gronk. What one player is willing to do has zero bearing on Stafford's intentions. Once again, his wife is actually on record saying they are ok with a trade. Lmao at anyone thinking he's retiring. I'll just wait to hear what hear whar team he plays for this year.![]()
New England Patriots' Rob Gronkowski confirms report he turned down trade to Detroit Lions
Rob Gronkowski confirmed a report that he threatened to retire rather than be traded to the Detroit Lions.www.usatoday.com
So your argument is using another player that isn't Stafford? That's laughable in itself. No one is talking about Gronk. What one player is willing to do has zero bearing on Stafford's intentions. Once again, his wife is actually on record saying they are ok with a trade. Lmao at anyone thinking he's retiring. I'll just wait to hear what hear whar team he plays for this year.
Stafford didn't get top of market, but Uncle Stan paid out $75.5m of the $160m extension in the first year. There is some value in getting almost half your contract up front in a period of high inflation.Ok, lets find middle ground here.
When Stafford signed his 160 mill extension, his AAV of 40 mill per season was not the highest for QB, IIRC he was somewhere around 7 or 8th highest paid. In other words, he didnt squeeze every dollar he could have. For that one could say he gave a discount.
Better?
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qskRCc99tSI
Trade Kupp, trade Stafford and then McVay leaves?
WTF ridiculousness is this...
Pick one: Spark. Fight. Winning. 2nd tier QB at much cheaper rate.He found what with Mayfield? 1 win in 4 starts and 0 TD in his final 2 games?
Generally speaking I just don't think it's productive to try to speak for the player, even if we keep the assumptions to things that are probably correct. Because he may be tired and sore and thinking he just wants to pad that retirement paycheck. I doubt that is him of course but it could be where his mind is. Just pointing this out because I don't like this acting like we know what he's thinking business.Stafford wants to get back to the Super Bowl and make it to the HoF.
Would anyone come after him for bonus money? The Rams didn't with Donald.But, isn’t this about more money in 2025? To walk away goes opposite that, including bonus money to repay.
Winning? They won 1 game in his 4 startsPick one: Spark. Fight. Winning. 2nd tier QB at much cheaper rate.
And please note I much prefer keeping Stafford for 2 more years and Rams being an NFC contender in 2025.
The Rams purposely paid his bonus knowing he was retiring because they wanted to keep the door open that he could return.Would anyone come after him for bonus money? The Rams didn't with Donald.
Great!Lol clueless as usual?
Coming from the stand up guy would not admit he was wrong even with photo evidence.
I'm just going to put you on ignore so I can avoid having to interact with you ever again in my life.
Yeah, some teams do, some don't. It doesn't seem very Rams-likey to go after him for that but if things got contentious, who knows.The Rams purposely paid his bonus knowing he was retiring because they wanted to keep the door open that he could return.
Lions made Sanders and Calvin Johnson pay it back. Chris Borland paid it back to the 9ers