Matthew Stafford Contract Status

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
7,875
So basically all were playoff QBs except Winston.
Yep.

But Allen also had 28 passing TDs and 12 rushing TDs. (Team finished 2nd in points scored).
Mayfield had 41 passing TDs and 3 rushing TDs. (Team finished 4th in points scored).
Hurts had 18 passing TD and 14 rushing TDs (not sure how many were tush pushes). (Team finished 7th in points scored).

Stafford 20 passing TDs. O rushing TDs. (Team finished 20th in points scored).
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
5,926
Yep.

But Allen also had 28 passing TDs and 12 rushing TDs. (Team finished 2nd in points scored).
Mayfield had 41 passing TDs and 3 rushing TDs. (Team finished 4th in points scored).
Hurts had 18 passing TD and 14 rushing TDs (not sure how many were tush pushes). (Team finished 7th in points scored).

Stafford 20 passing TDs. O rushing TDs. (Team finished 20th in points scored).
Part of that is thrown off by all the injuries we suffered on that o-line. I still rather have Stafford back as there is no better option. Dude was on the brink if eliminating the bitch ass Eagles if not for our shitty blocking up front. We definitely need to get a QB of the future behind Stafford but it also can't be forced just because he's closer to retirement than not since that would be a huge mistake. We need to roll with Stafford until the team has truly run its course with him. No matter what, anything after Stafford is really gonna be painful to see.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,569
Of course. No one disputes that every QB has dropped INTs.

But I hope you are wrong because the stat I read about him leading the league was around midseason.
The most glaring bad throws were near the end of the season, at least that I remember.

Early in the year he did have a bit of a struggle with poor line play and time to throw
 

DzRams

Pro Bowler
Joined
Mar 12, 2024
Messages
1,181
Name
Desmal M
Yep.

But Allen also had 28 passing TDs and 12 rushing TDs. (Team finished 2nd in points scored).
Mayfield had 41 passing TDs and 3 rushing TDs. (Team finished 4th in points scored).
Hurts had 18 passing TD and 14 rushing TDs (not sure how many were tush pushes). (Team finished 7th in points scored).

Stafford 20 passing TDs. O rushing TDs. (Team finished 20th in points scored).
We had so many OL and WR injuries the first half of the season that it's not a fair or accurate comparison to look at the entire season.

Maybe you could tell us how many points we scored and our ranking the second half of the season.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
7,875
The most glaring bad throws were near the end of the season, at least that I remember.

Early in the year he did have a bit of a struggle with poor line play and time to throw
We had so many OL and WR injuries the first half of the season that it's not a fair or accurate comparison to look at the entire season.

Maybe you could tell us how many points we scored and our ranking the second half of the season.
That's true. I just remember Tampa Bay losing Chris Godwin for the majority of the season. There may be more time missed from them and others, but I don't feel like looking it up.

Upon a quick perusal the offense only scored 21 points or more in 3 of his last 8 2024 regular season games.
Stafford had 9 TDs during his first 8 games and 11 in his final 8 games.

BTW, It also looks like Stafford only had 4 more TDs and 3 more INTs the prior season in one fewer game.
 
Last edited:

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,684
Name
mojo
There should be a statistic for INT’s and back breaking INT’s.

Then we can track dropped INT’s and dropped back breaking INT’s.

Nevermind.
 

Faceplant

Still celebrating Superbowl LVI
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Messages
10,307
That's true. I just remember Tampa Bay losing Chris Godwin for the majority of the season. There may be more time missed from them and others, but I don't feel like looking it up.

Upon a quick perusal the offense only scored 21 points or more in 3 of his last 8 2024 regular season games.
Stafford had 9 TDs during his first 8 games and 11 in his final 8 games.

BTW, It also looks like Stafford only had 4 more TDs and 3 more INTs the prior season in one fewer game.
That matches what we all saw, obviously. Stafford gives the Rams the best chance to win, no question about that. However, the Rams offense is still not very good even when healthy.

That's not on Stafford of course. Everyone has to be better if they want to take the next step. The players, coaches.... McVay in particular. The Rams got as far as they did this season, in large part, due to the outstanding play of their young defense. I believe the defense was also the lowest paid in the league?? If the (leagues most expensive) offense was even top 15, they are probably playing next Sunday.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
7,875
That matches what we all saw, obviously. Stafford gives the Rams the best chance to win, no question about that. However, the Rams offense is still not very good even when healthy.

That's not on Stafford of course. Everyone has to be better if they want to take the next step. The players, coaches.... McVay in particular. The Rams got as far as they did this season, in large part, due to the outstanding play of their young defense. I believe the defense was also the lowest paid in the league?? If the (leagues most expensive) offense was even top 15, they are probably playing next Sunday.
Matthew Stafford gives the team the best chance to win vs. Garoppolo short term.

However, it's possible that Stafford may not give the team the best chance to win over Garoppolo PLUS players obtained via draft pick compensation and the cap space cleared of moving him. And that's short term and long term.

IMO, that's the Rams dilemma.
 

majrleaged

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
4,581
Matthew Stafford gives the team the best chance to win vs. Garoppolo short term.

However, it's possible that Stafford may not give the team the best chance to win over Garoppolo PLUS players obtained via draft pick compensation and the cap space cleared of moving him. And that's short term and long term.

IMO, that's the Rams dilemma.
I think short term is the priority, with long term being considered. Garoppolo has always been a really good back up that played on a really good team. Then when he went to the Raiders he looked like what he is. A QB that floats at the level of the talent around him.

No doubt Stafford's numbers are middle of the pack, but if you think Grabmypole could have got this team to the playoffs the last 2 years, my opinion is you are mistaken.

You are also mistaken with your premise that keeping Stafford will make it impossible to upgrade the talent on this team. The last 2 years have proved that premise to be wrong.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,569
That's true. I just remember Tampa Bay losing Chris Godwin for the majority of the season. There may be more time missed from them and others, but I don't feel like looking it up.

Upon a quick perusal the offense only scored 21 points or more in 3 of his last 8 2024 regular season games.
Stafford had 9 TDs during his first 8 games and 11 in his final 8 games.

BTW, It also looks like Stafford only had 4 more TDs and 3 more INTs the prior season in one fewer game.
Coen was very good with the Bucs offense. He lost Godwin but was able to have a productive offense. One way he did that was by being creative in the run game.

I found it interesting that McVay mentioned Coen in one of his recent PCs. He also said that they need to be more creative on offense. I wonder if he’s thinking of copying some of what Coen did. The Rams offense felt a bit predictable at times this season.

Maybe scheme hindered Stafford a bit because many defenses seemed to be in the right place at the right time far more often than in recent seasons.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,569
Matthew Stafford gives the team the best chance to win vs. Garoppolo short term.

However, it's possible that Stafford may not give the team the best chance to win over Garoppolo PLUS players obtained via draft pick compensation and the cap space cleared of moving him. And that's short term and long term.

IMO, that's the Rams dilemma.
Considering how well the young defense played later in the year, a few weapons could be all it takes to get the offense rolling again and give this team a better shot at a Super Bowl next year.

That’s how I’d be thinking if I was Snead and McVay. The window is wide open. Short term would be my focus, which means keeping Stafford.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
7,875
I think short term is the priority, with long term being considered. Garoppolo has always been a really good back up that played on a really good team. Then when he went to the Raiders he looked like what he is. A QB that floats at the level of the talent around him.

No doubt Stafford's numbers are middle of the pack, but if you think Grabmypole could have got this team to the playoffs the last 2 years, my opinion is you are mistaken.

You are also mistaken with your premise that keeping Stafford will make it impossible to upgrade the talent on this team. The last 2 years have proved that premise to be wrong.
I've already stated that Stafford is a better option than Garoppolo alone. And whether or not he could have gotten this team to the playoffs the last 2 seasons is irrelevant. 2025 and beyond is what matters.

And I never said it was impossible to upgrade the talent on this team by keeping Stafford. My point was that it is possible that it would be easier and more could be done to add AND maintain said talent by moving him instead of increasing the HUGE dead cap hit the team has got coming when he's done.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
7,875
Considering how well the young defense played later in the year, a few weapons could be all it takes to get the offense rolling again and give this team a better shot at a Super Bowl next year.

That’s how I’d be thinking if I was Snead and McVay. The window is wide open. Short term would be my focus, which means keeping Stafford.
In 2021 I'd probably agree with you. But with soon to be 37 year old Matthew Stafford with perhaps a huge new contract I having trouble getting there.
 

Memphis Ram

Legend
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
7,875
Coen was very good with the Bucs offense. He lost Godwin but was able to have a productive offense. One way he did that was by being creative in the run game.

I found it interesting that McVay mentioned Coen in one of his recent PCs. He also said that they need to be more creative on offense. I wonder if he’s thinking of copying some of what Coen did. The Rams offense felt a bit predictable at times this season.

Maybe scheme hindered Stafford a bit because many defenses seemed to be in the right place at the right time far more often than in recent seasons.
I'm hoping he lessens the 11 personnel illusion of complexity stuff and better varies his personnel packages while focusing more on play action.
 

El Chapo Jr

Legend
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
5,926
Considering how well the young defense played later in the year, a few weapons could be all it takes to get the offense rolling again and give this team a better shot at a Super Bowl next year.

That’s how I’d be thinking if I was Snead and McVay. The window is wide open. Short term would be my focus, which means keeping Stafford.
Exactly, if a team is close, you take your shot at a Superbowl as they are already hard as hell to win.
 

So Ram

Legend
Camp Reporter
Joined
Jun 18, 2014
Messages
15,572
I've already stated that Stafford is a better option than Garoppolo alone. And whether or not he could have gotten this team to the playoffs the last 2 seasons is irrelevant. 2025 and beyond is what matters.

And I never said it was impossible to upgrade the talent on this team by keeping Stafford. My point was that it is possible that it would be easier and more could be done to add AND maintain said talent by moving him instead of increasing the HUGE dead cap hit the team has got coming when he's done.

Dude - I totally agree.I enjoyed watching Jimmy G’s pocket presence which Mattew Stafford doesn’t have.As far as QB & passing ? Stafford is a HOF QB . He also playing at a high level,but still keeps the offense in a box.
—What I saw was how Jimmy G used outlets to keep the chains moving & letting the players make plays.We all saw the last drive & it’s also part of how The Rams season ended as well.With a chance to win in The Red Zone.

—The point your making is sort f like the AD99 point !! I’d say moving on would not be the End of ALL !! Finding depth is going to be huge & building this group of Great Draft Classes.