You may be right, but at the end of the day, you need that QB that can will a team to victory in that big games. All the QBs you mentioned have choked big time in that department. That big ass play against Tampa is a great example. Stafford threw to Kupp who was supposed to be a decoy on that play. Stafford has been clutch like no other. He would have been clutch against Philly if the damn line would have at least gotten into Carter's way.
We'll just disagree then as its new to me if it changes how it effects the cap and how we can pay other players. I just hope no matter what, it simply works out.
Lets just stick with a mutual agreement that we look forward to Stafford finishing his career in horns
True. But I'm not sure that technique works on everybody.
Yeah. But if we are being honest, Stafford is some dropped INTs from possibly being considered in the same boat. Sure, he may be on a higher deck, but with those INTs he'd be on the boat.
It's not our money, which is why we have deep pocket Stan Kroenke! Fork it over, STan!
But he has gotten paid. I doubt he'll be begging on the street corner Like @Merlin and me....
I think Stafford is the ONE essential Rams player. Without him, we may not make the playoffs the next couple of years. As much as I loved AD, you could not say that when he left.. The QB position is different and is more impactful than any other. Coaching won't make a John Wolford good enough and without a massive, franchise altering deal with multiple 1st round picks in trade, we are not replacing Stafford.
Yeah. Will we have to disagree.
Yeah, that defense Frisco had was more important than Jimmy G. for those two NFC Championships. Plus, we had/have an offense that requires more from a QB than Shanny needed, which was better than Frisco (Super Bowl 56).
Sure. But, one could argue that the defense was just as important as Stafford this season and with some additions could be approach that 49er defense.
