Matthew Stafford Contract Status

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Psycho_X

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
12,499
Lol, this Stafford shit making NFL insiders get into cat fights in Starbucks now. Also, reading a story by Mike Florio makes me feel dumber. I feel bad giving this guy clicks when I went to the story before I realized it was from him.


Jordan Schultz verbally accosted Ian Rapoport at a Starbucks in Indianapolis
By
Mike Florio

The Scouting Combine brings the entire NFL community together. For better, and for worse.

Per multiple sources who witnessed the interaction, Jordan Schultz of Fox and Ian Rapport of NFL Media engaged in a verbal altercation on Wednesday afternoon at the Starbucks at the JW Marriott in Indianapolis. Schultz, we’re told, accosted Rapoport.

The incident first came to widespread light when PFT Commenter (a/k/a Eric Sollenberger . . . a/k/a the twin brother of the late Eric Sollenberger) posted a tweet on Wednesday night that referred to a “serious big time media confrontation” between a “two NFL newsbreakers.” The tweet sparked much speculation and an effort to get to the bottom of the situation.

The fact that it happened at a Starbucks provides an intriguing coincidence; Schultz is the son of former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz.

We’re told that Rapoport was talking to an agent. Schultz approached Rapoport and said, “We need to talk.” (Or specific words to that effect.)

Rapoport replied, we’re told, “We don’t need to talk.” (Or specific words to that effect.)

Schultz then made accusations about Rapoport, we’re told. Rapoport, we’re told, regards the accusations as unfounded. The two men were essentially face to face.

“If you have anything to say it to me, say it to my fucking face,” Schultz said, or specific words to that effect. “If this continues we’re going to have a fucking problem.” (As noted below, Schultz does not recall using profanity.)

Rapoport then asked Schultz to step back.

“If this happens again, we’re gonna have fucking problem,” Schultz said, or specific words to that effect. “Now I’ll step back.”

The incident was reported to NFL Security. And NFL Security has taken statements from multiple witnesses.

Rapoport declined to comment on the situation. Schultz told PFT this via text message: “It really isn’t anything too much. Ian Rapoport and I had a verbal confrontation. It lasted a little over a minute. Multiple agents and reporters were nearby. Rapoport was the one who called security shortly after, but it never escalated further.”


Schultz initially disputed the number of expletives in the account as provided to PFT. He then said he recalls using none.

Rapoport told a witness that NFL Security was informed of the exchange because it was regarded as a threat of physical violence.

The NFL did not immediately respond to a request for comment from PFT.

The catalyst, by all appearances, was Schultz’s Wednesday report that Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford recently met with Raiders minority owner Tom Brady in Montana. Rapoport downplayed the report as a chance, unplanned meeting. Schultz dismissed the notion that it was a random encounter between Brady and Rapoport.

That said, it sounds as if tensions between the two reporters have been (wait for it) brewing, for a while.

We’ll see where it goes from here, if anywhere. But it has provided an unexpected shot of espresso to an otherwise sleepy week in Indianapolis.
 

Haden

Kurt Warner for President
Joined
Nov 15, 2022
Messages
286
Name
Dave
Too bad those two wimps didn't get into a good old fistfight. At least pull a Jim Everett and push someone around and knock over a table.
 

Elmgrovegnome

Legend
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
23,582
Lol, this Stafford shit making NFL insiders get into cat fights in Starbucks now. Also, reading a story by Mike Florio makes me feel dumber. I feel bad giving this guy clicks when I went to the story before I realized it was from him.


Jordan Schultz verbally accosted Ian Rapoport at a Starbucks in Indianapolis
By
Mike Florio

The Scouting Combine brings the entire NFL community together. For better, and for worse.

Per multiple sources who witnessed the interaction, Jordan Schultz of Fox and Ian Rapport of NFL Media engaged in a verbal altercation on Wednesday afternoon at the Starbucks at the JW Marriott in Indianapolis. Schultz, we’re told, accosted Rapoport.

The incident first came to widespread light when PFT Commenter (a/k/a Eric Sollenberger . . . a/k/a the twin brother of the late Eric Sollenberger) posted a tweet on Wednesday night that referred to a “serious big time media confrontation” between a “two NFL newsbreakers.” The tweet sparked much speculation and an effort to get to the bottom of the situation.

The fact that it happened at a Starbucks provides an intriguing coincidence; Schultz is the son of former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz.

We’re told that Rapoport was talking to an agent. Schultz approached Rapoport and said, “We need to talk.” (Or specific words to that effect.)

Rapoport replied, we’re told, “We don’t need to talk.” (Or specific words to that effect.)

Schultz then made accusations about Rapoport, we’re told. Rapoport, we’re told, regards the accusations as unfounded. The two men were essentially face to face.

“If you have anything to say it to me, say it to my fucking face,” Schultz said, or specific words to that effect. “If this continues we’re going to have a fucking problem.” (As noted below, Schultz does not recall using profanity.)

Rapoport then asked Schultz to step back.

“If this happens again, we’re gonna have fucking problem,” Schultz said, or specific words to that effect. “Now I’ll step back.”

The incident was reported to NFL Security. And NFL Security has taken statements from multiple witnesses.

Rapoport declined to comment on the situation. Schultz told PFT this via text message: “It really isn’t anything too much. Ian Rapoport and I had a verbal confrontation. It lasted a little over a minute. Multiple agents and reporters were nearby. Rapoport was the one who called security shortly after, but it never escalated further.”


Schultz initially disputed the number of expletives in the account as provided to PFT. He then said he recalls using none.

Rapoport told a witness that NFL Security was informed of the exchange because it was regarded as a threat of physical violence.

The NFL did not immediately respond to a request for comment from PFT.

The catalyst, by all appearances, was Schultz’s Wednesday report that Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford recently met with Raiders minority owner Tom Brady in Montana. Rapoport downplayed the report as a chance, unplanned meeting. Schultz dismissed the notion that it was a random encounter between Brady and Rapoport.

That said, it sounds as if tensions between the two reporters have been (wait for it) brewing, for a while.

We’ll see where it goes from here, if anywhere. But it has provided an unexpected shot of espresso to an otherwise sleepy week in Indianapolis.
Schulz sounds like the aggressor and from Ian’s standpoint I’d say it certainly sounded like a threat.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,688
Name
mojo
Shultz vs Rapaport
LIVE from Indianapolis
Funny Cats Cat Fight GIF
 

Memento

Your (Somewhat) Friendly Neighborhood Authoress.
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Messages
18,875
Name
Jemma
125!! WE MADE IT TO 125 PAGES OF NOTHING BUT SPECULATION!!

Let's get to 150!! I know we can do it!!!
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
25,117
I think if there is a serious possibility of a trade, we would see that Stafford and the Rams have agreed to push out the date on his roster bonus payout.
If Rams are paying it, they are planning on him staying
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
42,059
I think if there is a serious possibility of a trade, we would see that Stafford and the Rams have agreed to push out the date on his roster bonus payout.
If Rams are paying it, they are planning on him staying
Saw a tweet that teams want to know by the end of the Combine if we're trading him.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
25,117
I don't understand the Rams perceived cheapness......well, I do......and I don't.......
It begins with the media's lack of accurate information.
Namely the most important piece, does Stafford consider he's getting 40 mill per year on his deal, or "just" 27 mill this year?
 

OldSchool

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
42,059
It begins with the media's lack of accurate information.
Namely the most important piece, does Stafford consider he's getting 40 mill per year on his deal, or "just" 27 mill this year?
Imagine media reporting anything accurately, all they want is clicks which the get from sensationalizing thing.
 

Varg6

Pro Bowler
Joined
Aug 23, 2014
Messages
1,089
Name
Jake
I may be mistaken but I was at the airport this morning and saw on NFL Network that Stafford and Rams are reworking their deal.

Take it with a grain of salt as I haven’t seen any reports confirming this but hopefully this is what’s happening.
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,687
Name
Scott
I think if there is a serious possibility of a trade, we would see that Stafford and the Rams have agreed to push out the date on his roster bonus payout.
If Rams are paying it, they are planning on him staying
Or they pay it to get a better deal in regards to draft pick compensation
 

Dodgersrf

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2014
Messages
11,506
Name
Scott
If Stafford isn’t ready to sign a four year deal with a new team, then it doesn’t even make sense for us to trade him.
Who’s going to give up high picks for a 1-2 year rental?

Getting a mid round pick and taking an upside down cap hit, shouldn’t even be an option.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,543
"You're not important enough for my time. Move along kid."
~ Ian
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,687
Name
Scott
Probably stating the obvious, but we should know by this weekend what the deal is... staying or going. And maybe we find out if it's starting to get contentious if this is still lingering by Sunday night.
 

majrleaged

Hall of Fame
Joined
Sep 10, 2016
Messages
4,588
My whole thinking is 1st round value not necessarily a 1st rounder. Especially with the 2 teams that seem to be most likely or pushing the hardest to trade for him. We're not getting pick #3 or #6 unless we give them 26 and a sweetener IMO.
I hope your are right, because if that is so, then I wouldn't expect a trade. There is taking care of your player and getting less on the trade market to do it when you want to dump cap cause you think your window is closing. Which is what we have been used to. And then there is giving away a franchise QB. Teams have given up 3 1st round picks for a player that has never played on the hope he will become even half of what Stafford is. Yes, he is near the end of his career, but to instantly be a SB contender in your fanbases mind?
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,543
What I find interesting is the mentality by the Raiders that they are contending now. Sounds like Brady influence and him leading this charge to upgrade QB is an important step in contending.

A good QB can get you to the playoffs in this league. You need a team to clear the table once you're in there of course, but getting into the playoffs is not nearly as hard as getting over the hump as a contender. Where this gets really interesting for Vegas is the sheer quality of the coaches in that division. Pete was an upgrade over what they have had at head coach, but he's still the worst head coach in that division. So reading Brady's intent here I'd say he's trying to get them an edge with a top QB who has mastery at the LOS in reads and checks and knowing what defenses want to do.

How Stafford jives with Chip Kelly is the big thing. Because by hiring Chip you could go get a college QB if you want and have Chip keep the offense and reads simplified while detailed gameplanning puts your offense on the map. That's not easy to do but it can be done, and was done last year in Washington.

But it is very interesting because the Raiders have Bowers, who is the type of guy who can be unstoppable when you have a QB who can move defensive coverages with his eyes. And they have Mayer for 12 sets, Meyer as a secondary target that is respectable. They need one more pass game weapon and a RB, and they could be a very good offense. Certainly playoffs would be an expectation if they do that and add Stafford.

All that assumes, though, that he jives with the caller/designer. And that Chip can get along with Petey.