WestCoastRam
Legend
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 6,590
Jemma, that's a bit richFirst (#3 overall or #6 overall) and the first second of the buying team for Stafford alone. Let’s drive the price up!
Jemma, that's a bit richFirst (#3 overall or #6 overall) and the first second of the buying team for Stafford alone. Let’s drive the price up!
Maybe. That’s why I’m not settling for any less. If I want to trade our starting elite QB, it better hurt the other team.Jemma, that's a bit rich
Sure hope we're right. I've suspected all along that this was just "media driven shit show drama theater." But Stafford going out to Montana to play footsie with Brady on a ski trip freaks me out a bit. Stafford is ramping up the pressure.He stays. For some reason, I’m channeling @El Chapo Jr ’s balls into vibrating toward this all being a media driven shit show drama theater. Matthew will be in horns for the next three seasons. Calling it now.
I agree no team will give what the Rams want to give up their starting QB. And I think the Rams want less than anybody around here is suggesting and they still won't get that.1st and 2nd in ‘26 maybe?
Nah… fuck it. No team is giving the Rams what they need for Matty. He stays. We build. We give him an extra $10 mill this year plus an incentive laden 2 more with opt outs. He proves out? He’s golden and so are the Rams. He has to put his own money where his wife’s mouth is.
I still don't think Stafford will be traded....That Pack return on the Rodgers trade to the Jets doesn't seem too impressive, imo:
Pack gave:
Aaron Rodgers
2023 first-round pick (No. 15)
2023 fifth-round pick (No. 170)
Jets gave
2023 first-round pick (No. 13)
2023 second-round pick (No. 42)
2023 sixth-round pick (No. 207)
A conditional 2024 second-round pick that becomes a first if Rodgers plays 65% of the plays this season
--
A two-spot pick swap of first rounders, a fifth for a sixth, a couple seconds, incl. a conditional second.
Sure, Stafford is younger, but Rodgers was one year removed from back-to- back MVP years . . . which Stafford has 0.
Not sure how/if the Rams get significantly more for Matthew.
EDIT: #QuestFor200
If they're trading him, it's not because they want to, it's because they can't work out an acceptable contract number with him.Maybe. That’s why I’m not settling for any less. If I want to trade our starting elite QB, it better hurt the other team.
Also, WE’RE AT 124!! We CAN get to 125!
Excuse you! Are you saying women like me are high-maintenance?![]()
![]()
No.
The past two seasons have been great fun; and the Rams have been a Super Bowl caliber team.
Stafford has been terrific in crunch time and the playoffs.
With Stafford, the Rams are still a Super Bowl contender.
Without Stafford, they are not.
In any given season, there are maybe 8-10 teams with a chance; It's tough to be one of those teams.
Don't give that up.