- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 29,932
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #41
Donald Celiscar might be moved to fs after his workout...4.62 and 4.68 and TCU coach said Dawson wasn't a hard worker..think it showed at the combine
I don't care where Celiscar plays. We need a FS. You want to move him there, go ahead. Kid is a player at CB and he'll be a player at FS.
As far as Dawson is concerned, I evaluate what I can see. Not my job to evaluate character. I don't have the resources to do that.
it's one reason why the combine matters....
The Combine has its uses but it doesn't matter much for my evaluations unless something is very out of whack or a guy measures in poorly. Dawson didn't stop being a great football player because of what he ran on a track.
the combine is an apples to apples comparison for players from different college divisions, different conferences and different years
as a former coach you quickly learn to not trust only just stats...a player from a lower ranked division might have great stats but lack the athleticism to play with the big boys..
That's a fair point. So the best way is to try and evaluate players against the big boys. Here's Donald Celiscar against the big boys:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNcXR7HgbEY
That's the 13-1 Michigan State team that beat Stanford in the Rose Bowl.
Jenkins was just the tallest midget in the room...the combine is one way of telling if you are watching real talent or just a tall midget
No, it's not. Maybe for the guys who have no film against legitimate competition(D-II, D-III guys). But not for the guys who do.
For the guys who do, it's useful in terms of interviews, medical, and their overall measurements. The on the field testing such as the 40 are simply to affirm what's on film or make you go back and rewatch if it doesn't line up with what you saw.
I'll never adjust my rankings purely on their workout numbers. Would have to see something while watching additional games that changed my opinion.
best advice I can give him is never latch onto players early in the process and never stop evaluating players
Unfortunately, I'm going to disregard this advice. I always find players that I latch onto because they stand out to me on film. Sometimes I'm wrong, sometimes I'm right. But, for me, film trumps all.
But I never stop evaluating players. I always go back and watch more games on the players I like later in the process. It takes emotion out of it. If a guy stands out to you the first time...maybe it's just first impression. But if you watch him in multiple different viewings and he continues to stand out, he's just that good.
Last edited: