BeachRam78
Rookie
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2014
- Messages
- 178
- Name
- john
Looked to me like it might be his right leg. I feel bad for him. Hopefully it's nothing too bad
So yes, I'll ignore how "they" actually grade a defense. Because I'll take my defense that doesn't give up points over your defense that doesn't give up yardage.
This may be an interesting topic outside of a game day thread -- points allowed is obviously the best way to rank a defense despite how the media does it. But a bigger issue is offense has usually proven more successful at winning than defense, and the best way for a defense to help an offense is yards (or perhaps turnovers).if you go on any site (ESPN, NFL network-anyone) that's not how they rank it.
That's what I was thinking but I didn't want to say it. He's huge for us on special teamsLooks like an ACL tear.
That's great you keep on rooting for fewer yards I'll root for fewer points. After all we win if we out score the other team not out gain them in yards. It's all good to like giving up fewer yards, it's just not realistic to win that way.
I don't argue that your stat is very important and I like it. But what I'm saying to you is rankings at the end of the year, (or any point of the year) in terms of overall ranking are based on TOTAL defense. This is a fact. It just is. And we are not ranked in the top 10 in total defense. You can disagree and that's fine, but it's a factual statement, like it or not.
Are they? The first play is a drop by Quick, second play he trips over his O-Lineman.... Where are the glaring issues there? That's not a fundamental flaw, that's bad receiver play and bad luck.
I see a guy who doesn't throw the ball particularly well. He manages the game well and doesn't make a lot of bad decisions. But he's not a good thrower.
Would you rather have the defense that has a better ranking or gives up less points?You can have whatever opinion you like but if you go on any site (ESPN, NFL network-anyone) that's not how they rank it.
So it's all good, just not reality.
And Jrry said we're top 10 in points allowed and you argued that we're not a top 10. You're arguing just for the sake of arguing. Unless you're denying that we were top 10 in points allowed?My lord man, do you always argue just to argue? This wasn't even a discussion about what I'm ROOTING for. It was about a statement that Jrry made about us having a top 10 defense in which he picked ONE very specific category to make his statement seem true. Sure, if it was based on only points allowed then it's true. But rankings are not nor ever will be about one stat. OVERALL defense we are not in the top 10. That is a FACT. Do I like that? Of course not and yeah I prefer how many points we give up to any other. But that is not what the response was about.