- Joined
- Jun 28, 2010
- Messages
- 49,209
- Name
- Burger man
South Korea: 51 million people, 422 deaths
When the story of this pandemic is written, we’ll be talking about how bad the data was.
Too many instances of... “huh?” in the data.
South Korea: 51 million people, 422 deaths
S Korea’s success (and single-minded devotion to mitigation) has been written about extensively, though.When the story of this pandemic is written, we’ll be talking about how bad the data was.
Too many instances of... “huh?” in the data.
S Korea’s success (and single-minded devotion to mitigation) has been written about extensively, though.
S Korea threw the kitchen sink and more at Covid.
Like NFL games? 20 some odd guys, no masks, no social distancing literally on top of each other for several hours. I guess you are opposed to Football right now?Correct-- insofar as anytime people gather in large compact crowds, without social distancing and without masks, I think they are being reckless and stupid.
Comparing the U.S. to South Korea, a country 1% the size of the U.S., which also btw, is essentially an island, reeks of an agenda. The physical size alone makes the comparison basically invalid. Plus, South Korea really only has one airport. May as well use New Zealand as a shining example. The U.S. dealt, (is dealing), with 50 individual governments, all with different approaches.S Korea’s success (and single-minded devotion to mitigation) has been written about extensively, though.
S Korea threw the kitchen sink and more at Covid.
The U.S. dealt, (is dealing), with 50 individual governments, all with different approaches.
Personally, I think the country functions best when when people are split 50-50 on key issues, but that's an discussion for another time.
When it comes to a virus that does not understand state borders or political ideologies, do not think the United States should function as ‘50 individual governments’.
Like your take on split opinions on ‘issues’ but I don’t view a worldwide health emergency as an ‘issue’.
This whole discussion is about borders and politics.Maybe it "should not", but it does. And this kind of, imo, goes to what makes the U.S. the U.S. You can't have it both ways.
And nobody alluded to borders or political ideologies.
This whole discussion is about borders and politics.
It should not be, and does not have to be ... but it is.
reeks of an agendaComparing the U.S. to South Korea, a country 1% the size of the U.S., which also btw, is essentially an island, reeks of an agenda. The physical size alone makes the comparison basically invalid. Plus, South Korea really only has one airport. May as well use New Zealand as a shining example. The U.S. dealt, (is dealing), with 50 individual governments, all with different approaches.
We all know where you line up on the whole Covid thing, which is fine. Personally, I think the country functions best when when people are split 50-50 on key issues, but that's an discussion for another time. I'm just saying you simply cannot isolate the response, or lack thereof, to the pandemic in comparing the US to S Korea. It's not apples to oranges, it's basketballs to BBs.
Cheers.
Just a clarification.However, MY post was about comparing countries
Her parents tested positive later today. Just went on a supply run for them to help ease the symptoms since the doctors are giving them nothing. So confusing.
I think we both know under an Emergency Act the Pres can legally do enact basically whatever he wants.I will only say that our Federal, State and Local governments have their own sphere of power and control. It's called Federalism. The hating MSM crucified Bush because he didn't overide the Gov of Louisiana and the Mayor of New Orleans in forcing aid on the area after the glancing blow from hurricane Katrina. I was part of the response, waiting for these government to ask/give permission to the federal govt for help (I drove a tour bus down to the area and ferried people from downtown New Orleans to Dallas.). We didn't shift a gear until the Guv and the Mayor asked for help.
Under Federalism, the President just can't enforce the will of the federal govt, unless it's a Civil War. This is why the current POTUS can't enforce a facemask ban without laws being passed, subject to SCOTUS review. It's why the Governor of Kansas' order to require facemasks, was subject to local government approval and subject to overturn by the State Supreme Court.
The common technique of the federal govt to force a state's compliance is to threaten to remove federal funds for roads, or some such thing....But this is an end-around ofwhat the founders meant in the concept of federalism, and I sure as hell don't want that.