- Joined
- Jul 15, 2010
- Messages
- 14,462
- Name
- Bo Bowen
Nine for nine? Wow, kinda losing confidence with anything I hear concerning Covid.
It's not medical it's just a thing. A false positive is when the test says you're positive but upon further review you are not. A false negative of the opposite, the test came back negative, but you really have it. Nobody take about those rates though because it's too technical and inconvenient for narratives on either side. Plus, if the false positive and false negative rates are equal, then the general assumptions based on the data are fineI must be dumb asf. What is a false positive? If they tested positive by accident it was a negative? Maybe it's a medical thing I don't comprehend?
Using the CS analogy worked perfect for the comprehension part! lol I'm getting my BS and eventually my MS in Cyber Security, just signed up for a Coding Bootcamp to for the next 4 months. Guess no better way to immerse yourself than jump off in the deep end right? lol Any tips you may have for me?It's not medical it's just a thing. A false positive is when the test says you're positive but upon further review you are not. A false negative of the opposite, the test came back negative, but you really have it. Nobody take about those rates though because it's too technical and inconvenient for narratives on either side. Plus, if the false positive and false negative rates are equal, then the general assumptions based on the data are fine
I've mostly seen it in the cyber security world where they're talking about automated that detection. A false positive is when the system says "oh shit you're being attacked!" But it's just Bob in accounting running a particular once a year job the system hasn't encountered before. A false negative is when the system says some action or internet traffic was benign but it's actually someone owning your servers (or preparing to).
I must have missed the “false negative” posts?It's not medical it's just a thing. A false positive is when the test says you're positive but upon further review you are not. A false negative of the opposite, the test came back negative, but you really have it. Nobody take about those rates though because it's too technical and inconvenient for narratives on either side. Plus, if the false positive and false negative rates are equal, then the general assumptions based on the data are fine
I've mostly seen it in the cyber security world where they're talking about automated that detection. A false positive is when the system says "oh shit you're being attacked!" But it's just Bob in accounting running a particular once a year job the system hasn't encountered before. A false negative is when the system says some action or internet traffic was benign but it's actually someone owning your servers (or preparing to).
Trump, FDA tout COVID-19 convalescent plasma treatment, but some say it's still unproven
Trump, FDA tout COVID-19 convalescent plasma treatment, but some express concerns
The Food and Drug Administration announced Sunday it was issuing an emergency authorization for convalescent plasma treatment in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.abcnews.go.com
I must have missed the “false negative” posts?
These false positives are a major issue.ifthe test results breed feelings of lack of integrity, it’s a disaster.
Does it ever?LOL 148 pages of people arguing one side or another..
Has what you argued changed the world?
If you make many posts and argue you points of course it does! LolDoes it ever?
Oh, it already has. I, for one, already feel there is no need to go get tested for anything. It seems everything lately is a 50% chance of being accurate. Hell, I have that much info already about anything just sitting at the house. It is or it ain't.I must have missed the “false negative” posts?
These false positives are a major issue. if the test results breed feelings of lack of integrity, it’s a disaster.