Different than making Lamp a center? No not really but I've mostly thought about him as a Guard in the NFL not a center.
If we draft him, it's to play Center. Cody Whitehair made the same swap last year. It's not a huge deal.
Different than making Lamp a center? No not really but I've mostly thought about him as a Guard in the NFL not a center.
Fair enough I guess I just like Dawkins too much as a Tackle, he's definitely athletic enough to move to Center and strong enough.If we draft him, it's to play Center. Cody Whitehair made the same swap last year. It's not a huge deal.
Fair enough I guess I just like Dawkins too much as a Tackle, he's definitely athletic enough to move to Center and strong enough.
Struggled throughout? I am curious.... how did you arrive at this conclusion?
Curious....does the centers opponent play into this? I mean, Toth played in the SEC....versus SEVERAL DT's that will be playing on Sunday. He started for 4 years. Like den said, he's graduated in a degree in mechanical engineering. This is the second year we have a shot at one of these types. I can't see any metric that can honestly rate who could be more successful than him in the pros.Asiata is 24th % and Pocic is 22.6%.
Just from watching them play I would be ok with Pocic, Asiata, or Orlosky at center (round 3-4). They have issues, but they each play with a lot of strength and have enough size and athletic ability to function.
Here is a list of sparq scores (https://3sigmaathlete.com/rankings/ol/). Sparq only measures athleticism and it is weight/height adjusted. The percentiles are just the average for that position in the NFL, so 50% is the NFL average and very good.Curious....does the centers opponent play into this? I mean, Toth played in the SEC....versus SEVERAL DT's that will be playing on Sunday. He started for 4 years. Like den said, he's graduated in a degree in mechanical engineering. This is the second year we have a shot at one of these types. I can't see any metric that can honestly rate who could be more successful than him in the pros.
I bet centers are compared with other linemen, just like Toth was.....and of course he scores horrible when compared to an elite tackle like...Garrett Bolles.Elflein for example is in the 2.2 percentile so 97.8% of offensive linemen in the league are more athletic. OL are usually the least athletic group so everyone on the defense will have an advantage over him. I'm assuming it would be like a bell curve where most players are around 30-70th percentile because a lot of the top athletic testers are rare (and usually more athlete than football player) and the low testers are at a disadvantage.
Toth's competition and intelligence go in his favour, but his athleticism is concerning.
I agree with everyone above that Fuller and Elflein are scary prospects. The center prospects in this class are insanely unathletic and it shows. I saw people here talking about sparq and I think its a good idea to have thresholds with athleticism. Its so hard to become even average when every single player in the league is bigger, stronger, and faster. For offensive line I would say that 15-10th percentile would be the lower limit.
Elflein - 2.2%
Toth - 4.1%
Fuller - 6.4%
Roullier - 6.5%
Asiata is 24th % and Pocic is 22.6%.
Just from watching them play I would be ok with Pocic, Asiata, or Orlosky at center (round 3-4). They have issues, but they each play with a lot of strength and have enough size and athletic ability to function. Pocic reminds me of Brandon Linder and Orlosky of Corey Linsley.
Lucas Crowley and Cam Keizur are intriguing in the later rounds but are not going to start in the near future.
Here is a list of sparq scores (https://3sigmaathlete.com/rankings/ol/). Sparq only measures athleticism and it is weight/height adjusted. The percentiles are just the average for that position in the NFL, so 50% is the NFL average and very good.
Elflein for example is in the 2.2 percentile so 97.8% of offensive linemen in the league are more athletic. OL are usually the least athletic group so everyone on the defense will have an advantage over him. I'm assuming it would be like a bell curve where most players are around 30-70th percentile because a lot of the top athletic testers are rare (and usually more athlete than football player) and the low testers are at a disadvantage.
Toth's competition and intelligence go in his favour, but his athleticism is concerning.
This has nothing to do with anything, but I wonder if the OL players in college have stronger academic performance than other position groups. It seems like every year there are OL prospects with masters degrees or degrees in STEM fields. I can't imagine playing D1 football and getting a degree in mechanical engineering.
In fact, compare the best Center in the NFL (Travis Frederick) to Chase Roullier (fell into the 6.5 percentile on Sparq):
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=125022&draftyear=2017&genpos=C
http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/dsprofile.php?pyid=90293&draftyear=2013&genpos=C
Their numbers are incredibly similar across the board (including height and weight).
Only 4 of the 20 would even be close to the 10th % or below it. What's interesting is that those 4 are top 10 Cs.
Its not an end all be all, but its something to think about. I would be upset forcing a position and drafting a horrible athlete in rounds 2-3 when there are going to be great players from other positions. I wouldn't really argue with Roullier in round 5, but lesser athletes have a harder hill to climb.
Travis Frederick is insanely strong and it makes up for his athleticism. When he gets his hands on a player its over, his hands are like vice grips. The only C I see that with this year is Orlosky, and its not close to Frederick's strength.
I looked at their athletic charts (for example Groy, https://www.mockdraftable.com/player/ryan-groy). I remember sparq considered 10 yard splits and jumps very highly, so some players have very fast 10 yard times that would put them over the threshold. The majority of guys above were better testers than Havenstein who was like 13th percentile. So I just assumed they were above that as well, I could be wrong.I don't agree. You didn't give us numbers for most of the guys. You just claimed they were good athletes. I posted a number of these guys. Their numbers were pretty weak.
A good chunk of the top 15 Centers in the NFL (likely over half) would qualify as below average to bad athletes. Sparq is pretty useless for Centers.
OL athleticism is less important than say a CB, but it still part of the decision making process. Guys like Jarvis Landry and Travis Frederick can be great pros, but they are incredibly rare compared to the hundreds of players that test out similarly and cannot compete in the NFL.