You seem to have forgotten there was a lockout and the team couldn't practice. You're asking alot from a second year qb.
.
Maybe, but he couldn't do it and I'm not sure how much practicing would have helped him learn what different DC's were going to do.
It's been the downfall of a lot of top draft picks. And I've heard coaches say trying to learn how to read defenses in the NFL after never doing it before is nearly impossible.
Bradford turned out to be a journeyman, and he will probably bounce around the NFL for a few more years. It didn't work out well and that's the way it goes sometimes. We could have been stuck with Griffin, and a lot of people wanted him and were willing to dump Bradford for him. Look what that would have done to the team.
I think people can be critical of him and not "hate him". If he was selected in the 5th round there would be less feeling of being let down, but he was #1 overall and that carries expectations from fans. I seem to recall you (though I could be wrong) complaining about Austin and that he was a bust/sucked. But as fans we have favorites and people that liked and wanted Bradford in the draft often still defend him and have a tendency to push off the problems on everything around him.
Other than Warner, in my adult lifetime, the Rams have been cursed at the QB position. There has never been a star other than Warner until Goff was selected. Odd that there have been 3 guys at RB that are HOF players with Gurley likley making it four and shit at QB other than Warner during that span.
We could start one of those things like the Browns did with the jersey with all the QB's names.
By the way I wanted Bradford because I was done with Bulger and did not want to pay #1 overall money to a DE, it's just to big of a risk. He seemed like he had a good chance of becoming a good starter.