BRADFORD TRADED FOR FOLES (IN SUPER UPPER-CASE TO DETER DUPLICATE THREADS)

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Had to be done...

d0a.jpg
 
  • 7Like
Reactions: Rabid Ram, Legatron4, PressureD41 and 4 others
Well now they might as well rename the PD board to Stadium Talk. Because not even the Bradford trolls can give it some relief now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RamFan503
Mojo Ram said:
You and I both aren't Foles believers Jrry, but as long as we retain our #10 pick...I'm looking at Foles as a clear upgrade to Hill and Davis. That's how i'm rationalizing it anyway.
Click to expand...

It's not about being a Foles believer or a Foles disbeliever. I think he's certainly competent. I think he can offer you solid play. But I'm just not sold he's anything more than that. Basically, I think he's more or less the caliber of QB that Jay Cutler is. Different type of QB but same caliber.

Hopefully, I'm wrong. I really do want the guy to be great. But I just see a solid QB...who needs help upfront. Which means that we need to get busy with the OL.
 
YES!!!!
I like returning from crushing a few frosty ones to see that the universe is not imploding but as suspected is really fucking great!!!

GO RAMS!!!
GO FOLES!!!!
 
12intheBox said:
@AdamSchefter: Texans traded QB Case Keenum back to the St. Louis Rams for a 7th-round pick in 2016, per league sources.
Click to expand...

Well, I guess that answers that question. But why trade for Keenum?
 
jrry32 said:
It's not about being a Foles believer or a Foles disbeliever. I think he's certainly competent. I think he can offer you solid play. But I'm just not sold he's anything more than that. Basically, I think he's more or less the caliber of QB that Jay Cutler is. Different type of QB but same caliber.

Hopefully, I'm wrong. I really do want the guy to be great. But I just see a solid QB...who needs help upfront. Which means that we need to get busy with the OL.
Click to expand...

As long as he retains a good TD/INT ratio we should win some games in a Fisher run first offense. We should be all in on O-line now to shore it up.
 
I think we over paid for Lance kennicks TE 4 year deal
 
  • Like
Reactions: V3
we are looking at this from the wrong angle. i just realized this listening to Warner right now on NFL Network. Kelly obviously has something special when it comes to using and grooming QB's. So... what did Kelly see in Bradford that was worth the risk and the money. AND more importantly what DIDN'T he see in Foles.
 
Tron said:
I thought Chip liked mobile qb's?

I am still wrapping my head around this. HOLY crap!!!!

Anyone want to buy two Sam Bradford jerseys, in perfect condition, worn a dozen or so times.........
Click to expand...

OK let me guess, they haven't been worn for the last 27 games right? :whistle:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Force16X and Tron
Irish said:
This board has the biggest collection of Bradford fans on the internet. I can empathize with losing a player you really liked, it sucks. Hard.

I kid you not, the back of my closet currently features a Pujols Cardinals jersey, a Brett Hull hockey jersey, a Steven Jackson throwback, and a Chris Carpenter Cardinals Jersey (I still wear this one, he is my favorite player).

Just because some of us weren't all in on Bradford doesn't mean a lot of people were. It's rough.
Click to expand...
Where are you reading this stuff? The only thing i see is fans in this 25 page mega thread are more concerned with fair compensation in giving up Bradford.
There's no fire. No need to blow smoke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dieter the Brock and ZigZagRam
Wouldn't it be cool if the swap of picks was their first rounder this year for our second this year, and our 2nd next year? Conditional on whatever?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jsimcox
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back