Dunno all sports including football have subjective calls that can be reviewed. It's nothing new. (Flagrant foul, blocking the plate, Did he have control of the catch?) just to name a few without even thinking that much.
All Saints Crap Here!
- Thread starter Prime Time
- Start date
-
To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
- Status
Dunno all sports including football have subjective calls that can be reviewed. It's nothing new. (Flagrant foul, blocking the plate, Did he have control of the catch?) just to name a few without even thinking that much.
I'm officially done with the topic of the no call. I'm talking with so many people on multiple sites I'm mixing up conversations 
Let them have their salt and enjoy it with their heads buried in the sand. On the the Patriots.
Let them have their salt and enjoy it with their heads buried in the sand. On the the Patriots.
HE WITH HORNS
Hall of Fame
If there was a conspiracy to put the Rams in the superbowl, then they would have called lots of penalties against the Saints, and very few on the Rams. The opposite of that happened. And one non call gets blamed for the outcome, when there were non calls on both sides.
So your saying the missed facemask was the most obvious? Rams likely would have scored a TD and left the saints less time to get a TD of their own for the win.Ah so whichever blown officiating I feel is "the most obvious" is the one that most affects the outcome?
@El caliente Sorry about your loss.
I just was reading through and wanted to post this and pose this question. Say that both Ram infractions were committed. Well then in a world where that play was called right we still would have had offsetting penalties and replayed the down.
Here is hands to the face of A.D on that same "No Call" nullifying the play.....
I just was reading through and wanted to post this and pose this question. Say that both Ram infractions were committed. Well then in a world where that play was called right we still would have had offsetting penalties and replayed the down.
Here is hands to the face of A.D on that same "No Call" nullifying the play.....
Crock of shit, my friend...that's an intentionally misleading angle. They showed numerous replays of that play during and after the broadcast, from ALL angles. No contact to the helmet was made...disingenuous at best
- Thread Starter Thread Starter
- #447
You've become tiresome and that last sentence is over the line. Clean up your act or vacate the premises.
This must be a tough one for Saint fans to deal with. @El caliente, remember when you said if a team cheats and gets a SB out of it, that it would totally be worth it? Do you still feel this way? I'm asking because a lot of Saints fans say we cheated.
12intheBox
Legend
It will be about as effective as the petition to get a new ref crew.
At most, they may start a review process for PI calls / non calls. And I’d be ok w that.
But changing the result of the game. Gimme a break.
You mean the hit to the arm that caused the pick?
I've seen the face stomp on screen shots more than once...If I can find one I'll post it...In the mean time, I think you've made your point...The good folks here have now grown weary of your sanctimonious bullshit, you've now become an obnoxious boor...Good luck next year...
12intheBox
Legend
I can admit that the refs sucked the whole game, but they were consistent. And as fans that is all we can ask for, it sucked for us when they missed blatant facemask and unnecessary roughness penalties on the saints and it sucked for you guys when they missed penalties committed by Rams players. But at least they were consistent and not one sided. We told you all before the game that Vinovich sucks, now you know what we were talking about. But none of the missed calls prevented the saints from winning or gifted the Rams the win. The game was decided by the players, nobody could ask for anything more than that.
Last edited:
It looked more like he jumped over the players getting up from the pile and landed on the upper back/neck of Reynolds well after the play was over. As I said the saints players were getting up from the pile when the dickwad jumped over them to land on Reynolds, he should have been ejected. But the refs being consistent with their calls/non calls did not throw a flag.
It was well after the whistle, saints players were getting up off the pile before he jumped on Reynolds.
- Status