raised_fisT
Hall of Fame
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,502
Well FWIW fear is a natural and highly utilitarian emotion in fact it is by most accounts a sign of intelligence, and both my boys scored high enough on the ACT to get scholarships ,as did I on the tests on cumulative knowledge ,Minn Multi Phasic and never ever scored below 95 percentile on any tests for those things .Creating this kind of fear in a young mind releases chemicals in the brain that can cause permanent brain damage, affecting memory and cognitive function.
Fear at extreme level releases a cocktail of chemicals. That's not disputable. And this changes brain biology, sometimes permanently.Well FWIW fear is a natural and highly utilitarian emotion in fact it is by most accounts a sign of intelligence, and both my boys scored high enough on the ACT to get scholarships ,as did I on the tests on cumulative knowledge ,Minn Multi Phasic and never ever scored below 95 percentile on any tests for those things .
Of the two forms of motivation i understand fear is less effective long term and so should be used sparingly, but children who are never spanked still feel it and will generate it spontaneously so your contention of cause and effect might hold true in extreme cases but where the hell you gonna get permission to abuse kids to verify those kind of results.
Apply for a grant where you beat the freak out of kids ?????????????????:eek:
Fair enough but in studies it seems clear that more than half of the kids today are "spanked". I would pull up links but I'm on my ipad. LolFirst of all the phrase "a lot of you" is really painting with a broad brush and is totally untrue from what I've read in this thread. And yes, I've read every post. And secondly the statement "the majority of kids today are still being spanked" is unprovable. How do you know that?
Fair enough but in studies it seems clear that more than half of the kids today are "spanked". I would pull up links but I'm on my ipad. Lol
I never said it was better for any type of person to be hit. One is legal and one is not. Whether they both should be illegal is up for debate, but, I never said one was "better" than another.Why is it better to hit a young child than to hit a grown woman? And the wife was being disciplined as well... There's no excuse for assaulting anyone, let alone children and your description of a few swats is not what often happens. Most parents who spank do it out of anger and frustration and people on forums always pretend like it's done in some sweet loving way. I've almost never seen that in my entire life. It's almost always done in anger. And it's not a few light swats either.. but the comparison is exactly the same. Wife beating used to be acceptable in some cultures and I hope spanking also becomes unacceptable over time.
Then finally, a lot of you seem to be under the impression that kids are rude and out of control because they're not being spanked enough, yet the majority of kids today are still being spanked.
Yeah, pretty disturbing.I just realised this was a 4 year old. That's freaking crazy.
What level of chemical? What level of violence, fear, shock ect?Creating this kind of fear in a young mind releases chemicals in the brain that can cause permanent brain damage, affecting memory and cognitive function.
And walk around any american city and just look at the peopleFair enough but in studies it seems clear that more than half of the kids today are "spanked". I would pull up links but I'm on my ipad. Lol
I'll dig out my research. But it's on a per incidence basis. Of course, the longer and more severe, the deeper the impact.What level of chemical? What level of violence, fear, shock ect?
What your saying is true, however, this has been implied in children suffering severe trauma and systematic abuse. Is this the case here? Who knows.
That's cool, I don't need the research. I'm familiar enough with it having worked with abused kids before (just in a voluntary basis).I'll dig out my research. But it's on a per incidence basis. Of course, the longer and more severe, the deeper the impact.
What did you see in abused kids? I'm curious.That's cool, I don't need the research. I'm familiar enough with it having worked with abused kids before (just in a voluntary basis).
It's sad.
Well, it was interesting. Both boys, one aged 11 or so when I started working with him, the other older. The first boy was mature for his age. He had seen a lot in a short period of time and was sort of wise beyond his years. The second was very immature for his age. The first boy was angry and could be aggressive and violent, although that was limited to peers and not adults. The second boy was not aggressive or violent at all, but, was very needy in an emotional way. If one was to "measure" the level of abuse suffered the first boy suffered less but was much angrier. The second boy suffered pretty profound abuse (father in prison for, among other things, trying to kill him) but did not have anger issues at all. The first boy was self confident and very assured in most ways. The second very insecure and had very much a victim mentality, which was sort of encouraged by his mother. They both carried emotional baggage from their experience certainly. But it was interesting how differently those were manifested and displayed. It really made me wonder about the old nature vs nurture thing. I wondered about kids in the same family, whether the situation is terrible or ok or great, you often get very different outcomes from each kid. Hard to know for sure.What did you see in abused kids? I'm curious.
Wow, thanks so very much for that. Amazing to me that you volunteered for this kind of work. I'm not sure I'd have the patience or the tolerance for it.Well, it was interesting. Both boys, one aged 11 or so when I started working with him, the other older. The first boy was mature for his age. He had seen a lot in a short period of time and was sort of wise beyond his years. The second was very immature for his age. The first boy was angry and could be aggressive and violent, although that was limited to peers and not adults. The second boy was not aggressive or violent at all, but, was very needy in an emotional way. If one was to "measure" the level of abuse suffered the first boy suffered less but was much angrier. The second boy suffered pretty profound abuse (father in prison for, among other things, trying to kill him) but did not have anger issues at all. The first boy was self confident and very assured in most ways. The second very insecure and had very much a victim mentality, which was sort of encouraged by his mother. They both carried emotional baggage from their experience certainly. But it was interesting how differently those were manifested and displayed. It really made me wonder about the old nature vs nurture thing. I wondered about kids in the same family, whether the situation is terrible or ok or great, you often get very different outcomes from each kid. Hard to know for sure.
I ended up with a very good and deep connection with the first boy, he eventually became a part of our family on a part time basis (splitting time between our home and his mothers). The second boy I never really connected with. I found it hard to deal with his "victim" mentality, but, I really tried to display great patience with him. I considered it a failing on my part that I was not able to have a more profound effect with him. I dont think he was ready to accept someone caring about him, not able to accept trust. He was not ready to hear honesty either.
I am not a professional by any means. It seemed to me that the boys both carried scars of course. They were very different. I dont know about cognitive function or effects in that regard. Neither was a great student, but, that is to be expected really. One thing the boys carried with them was a deep sadness. They would not express it directly but it was there. The first boy would lash out (I really believe violence in males is related a lot to sadness/depression), the second would internalize a lot of stuff and was manipulative. The survival instinct is strong and emotionally we do what we need to to survive.
Also, being old enough to know on an intellectual level that their experiences and families were not "normal" caused some social anxiety.
Im not sure if that answers your question at all. The biggest thing I saw with these boys was sadness, a lot of sadness in them.
Good info, thanks.Wow, thanks so very much for that. Amazing to me that you volunteered for this kind of work. I'm not sure I'd have the patience or the tolerance for it.
I really feel for these boys. It's so sad to see such young lives to dramatically affected, and damaged, by the adults in their lives. They really don't have much of a chance in life. And it takes great intestinal fortitude to recognize ones own issues and address them. And if if this can be achieved, it can take decades.
FYI... The lack of trust that you noticed in the 2nd boy is sometimes causes by severe neglect. Even as a baby, if one's basic needs are not attended to they can develop severe mistrust. So, if he was left to cry for long periods, or his diaper wasn't changed regularly, or he wasn't fed when he was hungry, the child can learn to be distrustful of other humans.
If the kids were beaten, that will send the neural processes to the rear of the brain, where we have our sort-of caveman portion of the brain. This is where we deal with fright or flight. And it bypasses the front part of the brain, where we perform rational logical analysis. What happens is the brain sends signal to the rear of the brain, because this is a very fast acting response mechanism. When the human recognizes this patterns again, they simply respond without even knowing what they are doing. This might explain any "irrational" outbursts you may have witnessed. As they would have been rear brain responses.
If the beatings were really severe, the brain disassociates, and can actually split in order to hide the horrible acts. This is called DIDS or disassociative identity disorder. Sometime patients like this get diagnose as schizoid. In this situation, you'll actually witness multiple personalities in the victim, which is done to bury the hurt, or the neural networks associated with abuse.
You impacted both boys. Just giving each a new set of events & behaviors to perceive changed the way their brains are wired and broke-down existing network structures. Instead of reinforcing their existing behavioral patters, you gave them new one. I don't see it as batting 500 at all. Both kids benefited, and you benefited from both of them as well.I disagree with the saint nonsense, I do appreciate the compliment however.
The book looks really interesting, I will order that for sure, thanks for the tip.
Like I said, I batted .500 with the boys I worked with. It was very educational but was sort emotionally tiring. I really bought into helping them. Committed to it. It was fun and rewarding but tiring in a way too.
To bring this conversation full circle, working so closing with boy one is why I stopped spanking my son, never did again. I never came close to anything I would remotely consider abusive or even unusual. But, that kid really made me reconsider a lot of things. Not only in how I was being a father but how I viewed people in general. Not to get too corny but sometimes we get involved in things to help out others and get helped ourselves. That boy changed me in a very good way. Made me a better person and a better father. I owe him. Thanks for the tip on the book again.
Man, I love this board. Good conversation about a touchy subject without it getting personal or rude. What a great place this is!!