- Joined
- Jul 27, 2010
- Messages
- 31,352
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b493c/b493c63bae2e34a5f2a97f9b4b411721d60abe6d" alt="Mood: Weddle"
HEY!They're trying to build Ficken's confidence up. This game is meaningless.
HEY!They're trying to build Ficken's confidence up. This game is meaningless.
Wow bud you say I'm the one who won't let go? I politely gave you a way to never see me again and you come back here with this? I'll do us both a favor since you clearly cant/won't been nice chatting with you but won't see you going forward #ignored#Not sure why you want to make this personal, but trust me when I tell you to go freak yourself.
Enjoy the game guys, but freak those that wanna just cry like little bitches about someone else's opinion. Cya for the playoffs.
Exactly... The catch discussion is so painful because of how many people spew inaccurate statements.
Different is going to the ground vs not going to the ground. Had Thomas been diving to make that it would have been incomplete. Process of the catch was completed after his second foot touched with him moving up field since he wasn't going to the ground.Well I was sure the Steelers scored that TD against the Patriots too so what do I know. Nothing, apparently.
Murky, but holds up and makes sense.
Shhhhh no voices of reason allowed in here!
That's not really fair. It's painful because the rule is nonsensical and needs to be changed. That's what causes the confusion.
Game not over yetWell, looks like if we had won this game we would have faced the Falcons...(Hawks losing)
I'm not disagreeing there, based on the outcome of the play. But Goodwin is as responsible for getting injured there as Countess is. If you're going over the middle to make a catch, you probably don't want to catch low, given the fact that defenders have such a small window where they can legally hit an offensive player.