#52 + #126(4th) will only move us up to #47 or #48. It would take #52 and #84 to move to the mid thirties.What would it cost to move up from 52 to late 30s if we really want to grab someone? Les has a hard time NOT trading, and if we could somehow trade our 4th to move up and keep 57 and both 3s, that would be sweeeet.
Anyone good with the draft trade value charts?
Right! here's his next video
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eOacEsSFnI&feature=emb_logo&has_verified=1
#52 + #126(4th) will only move us up to #47 or #48. It would take #52 and #84 to move to the mid thirties.
Personally, I don't really want to move up. There are going to be good players available all through the second and third rounds. We can sit still and let the draft come to us.then why not send 57 & keep 52 ??
Really? And the Packers drafting Rogers made no sense?Makes no sense unless you are trading rodgers
You are right. But, if you see a difference maker, on either side, you have to consider it. Most likely, we will try to trade down, one of our 2nd rounders. IMO, the players I would have made that move for are gone.Personally, I don't really want to move up. There are going to be good players available all through the second and third rounds. We can sit still and let the draft come to us.
If you can get a team to trade back for 57 instead of 52, but not all teams will lose the 50 points off the trade chart.
Which one? There were 2What in the holy fuck was standing behind Mike Vrabel?!?!?!?! Looked like he has his own gimp.
His man cave, is also his “freaky” cave.Which one? There were 2
Sure they can do that, if there is someone there they like. They did it last year with Henderson. If they really want someone and think they won't last until our pick, they very well may move up. I said personally that is what I would do this year because we have a lot of needs and zero cap.You are right. But, if you see a difference maker, on either side, you have to consider it. Most likely, we will try to trade down, one of our 2nd rounders. IMO,the players I wpull have made that move for are gone. So, now I’d be looking for a minor trade up, to ensure we get the player we want.
Totally understand, And agree. Never forget, we got cute, and missed on Bobby Wagner. I hope Snead, remembers, his own blunder.Sure they can do that, if there is someone there they like. They did it last year with Henderson. If they really want someone and think they won't last until our pick, they very well may move up. I said personally that is what I would do this year because we have a lot of needs and zero cap.
That was a big bite in the ass.Totally understand, And agree. Never forget, we got cute, and missed on Bobby Wagner. I hope Snead, remembers, his own blunder.
I think so. But you can see what they are thinking re: stopping the run if you want to top SF. Division goes through them now.Might’ve been a bit of a reach for our rivals at 27 tho.
Rams have pieces to trade to move up IMO. They could use them to lighten the load on the draft picks if they really want to get someone. I prefer we hold onto our picks here as much as possible.
I think so. But you can see what they are thinking re: stopping the run if you want to top SF. Division goes through them now.