I guess you know their QB pretty wellDamn!! I'm drafting 14 for the Vikings, and NO !ST Round Pick!! SHUCKS!!!@#$^^*()_+++)(**&^%##@#
At least I know how to Build around Bradford!
Wow, the Factory of Sad!! Well, it's not as if they don;t need just about everything so this shouldn't be too hard!!
Thanks but I feel a god complex coming on!! The Browns can be saved with one good draft.........If you would prefer the Redskins, i'll trade teams with you.
So you still appear to be asking everyone to visit multiple threads every time they make a pick. I don't think many would be happy with that. Those of us who have no life would probably find it more organized but from experience I've found that many of our GMs have trouble just checking in regularly.jrry32 back with some clarification:
It keeps you and others from having to repost the list constantly. You put the draft picks in one thread with the google doc in the OP. You open it up for editing, so people can add their picks as they make them (and make a post in the thread). That way, people will be able to check the OP of that thread for the draft order and who has been drafted. Just seemed easier to me.
So you still appear to be asking everyone to visit multiple threads every time they make a pick. I don't think many would be happy with that. Those of us who have no life would probably find it more organized but from experience I've found that many of our GMs have trouble just checking in regularly.
But here's the thing, I don't want anybody else making changes to either the "players already chosen" list or the draft results because I'd simply have to spend an inordinate amount of time checking their work. I say inordinate because you can never know what changes they've made so you have to check and recheck everything. How would I even know if they made the changes they were required to make? When I copy the last version into a new post I know exactly what changes have been made (none) and what changes I've made (only those that are necessary and all those that are necessary). I even alert the next GMs that they're on the clock/on deck despite the fact that they've already been notified by the last picker. I do that because ultimately the responsibility for making this mock work is mine. Though I often need close supervision. Especially at night.
I'm not vehemently against multiple threads and we're having this discussion in public because something I might not be fond of might be highly popular with the other members so let's hear some feedback from whoever might decide to comment and see how that goes.
It's time for everyone to do their Homework, or they won't stand a chance against me!!:rolllaugh::mrburnsevil:OK - so the Saints it is!
It's definitely homework time - I don't know too much about their roster or needs yet - and I don't think that I watched a single game they were in last season!! argggghhhh
I for one like the way you have it set up already Alan!!So you still appear to be asking everyone to visit multiple threads every time they make a pick. I don't think many would be happy with that. Those of us who have no life would probably find it more organized but from experience I've found that many of our GMs have trouble just checking in regularly.
But here's the thing, I don't want anybody else making changes to either the "players already chosen" list or the draft results because I'd simply have to spend an inordinate amount of time checking their work. I say inordinate because you can never know what changes they've made so you have to check and recheck everything. How would I even know if they made the changes they were required to make? When I copy the last version into a new post I know exactly what changes have been made (none) and what changes I've made (only those that are necessary and all those that are necessary). I even alert the next GMs that they're on the clock/on deck despite the fact that they've already been notified by the last picker. I do that because ultimately the responsibility for making this mock work is mine. Though I often need close supervision. Especially at night.
I'm not vehemently against multiple threads and we're having this discussion in public because something I might not be fond of might be highly popular with the other members so let's hear some feedback from whoever might decide to comment and see how that goes.
First, let me just say thanks for your kind offer.:grouphug:shaunpinney with an offer:
I will have my own big board that I will have here on Google Docs and I will tick players off myself too - I'm happy to grant @Alan access to that list or a backup GM in the instance of keeping the board going if something unforeseen happens and I'm AWOL.
:rimshot: Great job TK!TK42-RAM nailing my reference:
... you chose .... wisely.
So you still appear to be asking everyone to visit multiple threads every time they make a pick. I don't think many would be happy with that. Those of us who have no life would probably find it more organized but from experience I've found that many of our GMs have trouble just checking in regularly.
But here's the thing, I don't want anybody else making changes to either the "players already chosen" list or the draft results because I'd simply have to spend an inordinate amount of time checking their work. I say inordinate because you can never know what changes they've made so you have to check and recheck everything. How would I even know if they made the changes they were required to make? When I copy the last version into a new post I know exactly what changes have been made (none) and what changes I've made (only those that are necessary and all those that are necessary). I even alert the next GMs that they're on the clock/on deck despite the fact that they've already been notified by the last picker. I do that because ultimately the responsibility for making this mock work is mine. Though I often need close supervision. Especially at night.