Okay, bud, feel free to include the 7th WR who was on the roster as a special teamer to prove Washington's WRs are faster. If that's what you need for your argument to stand, it's a bad argument.
Good grief.
You keep saying that my arguments rely upon cherry picking when you've ignored my point, brought in and argued your own criteria (talk about a strawman), cherry picking all the way from your very first response. If you would at least simply open your eyes and take note that I'm talking about players making the team and NOT YOUR CRITERIA then we might get somewhere.
Oh well. Ross the 7th WR? Throughout their transactions, the Redskins maintained only 6 WRs on the roster last year. Ross was one of them. He made the opening day roster (key point) and stayed on the team until the final two games. My opinion? He may have been used more if Jackson went down to maintain that speed element on the field. Jackson didn't, thus he wasn't used as much and so the "special teamer" was only active 5 of 14 games. But, he still made the team for goodness sakes which goes back to my point. Not yours. Mine.
I know what Sanu and Hardy ran at the combine which is why I mentioned my view of the players speed before even mentioning their Pro Day 40 times. 40 times that I do not completely discount as you seem to have. But, then again I understand that while Pro Days can sometimes be more favorable for players (even though Josh Reynolds seemed to run slower for some reason), there have also been factors that have affected combine times over the years, too.
And yes, Even though he didn't get a lot of receptions, I consider Marquez a WR. A WR who plays special teams. Sorry, but again I understand that just because a player doesn't get the ball thrown to him, it doesn't mean he wasn't on the field. Besides, Hekker didn't pass for the 3 receptions Marquez got (remember a drop or two), nor did the Redskins punter pass for the 9 receptions Harris and Ross got while they were not contributing as you say.
Back to the TEs. Paul's and Carrier made the team and played. Just because they didn't have the criteria added production you require doesn't mean that they don't exist. No one ever said all of these guys contributed at the same level, but that they were on the roster. But, I get it. Apparently, if you don't care about someone, then neither should I care I guess. But, sorry that's not how things work.
On a side note, it's interesting how speed seems to be a consideration for so many of the Redskins bottom of the roster types you say don't matter.
As to the offense, I never said that LaFleur was running the offense in Atlanta. And we know McVay's role in Washington. Talk about straw. I merely pointed out that while McVay is running the show, it makes little sense or would be scary to believe that other offense staff didn't have input in what we will see in 2017. Quite frankly, we should all be disappointed if he just copied a Redskins playbook on the way out and handed it to his Rams staff and players. But, feel free to move on from the sub-argument you started.
You've met your burden to prove that you could argue your criteria against my statement and ignore mine. You could have simply accepted that my statement is for my criteria and not yours and simply moved on. But, you didn't and here we are.
BTW, contrary to your belief, I haven't gotten angry throughout this whole exchange. This has been kinda fun as I've been chuckling throughout the whole thing.
Next time try to stick to the point being made without changing the goalposts with your criteria of how things should be discussed or considered.
