- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 23,532
- Name
- mojo
State Farm, one of the biggest insurers in California, canceled hundreds of homeowners' policies last summer in Pacific Palisades—the same area which is now being ravaged by a devastating wildfire.
These insurance have learned over time what the triggers and elements are, the hard way, and undoubtedly saw this coming. The bastids.Fucking State Farm Stadium?!?!
Really? I didn’t think you could hardly get fire in that area?This is going to bring the CA Insurance market to it's fucking knees. This is insane...
Water in the fire hydrants would also be helpful. I dont understand how developers are allowed to build subdivisions in areas that are known to have wildfires regularly.There’s no fighting this fire until the wind dies down.
It’s already on its knees…this fire event will kick it to the curbThis is going to bring the CA Insurance market to it's fucking knees. This is insane...
Unbelievable, this one is growing fast like Pali but much harder to navigate out of due to tight canyons.A new fire just started in Runyon Canyon for those in the LA area that know that place. My gf lives right next to the entrance of Runyon. Hoping it doesn’t get too crazy.
She just got the mandatory evacuation noticeUnbelievable, this one is growing fast like Pali but much harder to navigate out of due to tight canyons.
This is all insane for me, so many friends getting affected. I am beside myself, thanks to you all for keeping it real. We are more than a football family we are human
Looks pretty flat to me.Yes, maybe harsh judgement on my part. Just that over my lifetime I've been scolded my entire life by parents, drill Sargents, bosses, etc for making stupid decisions. Not wishing harm on anyone or their property. But living in those hills has always been risky, and not just from fire. Earthquakes, land-mud slides are also a well-known hazard. But people take risks.
The best solution would be to not allow homes to be built so close together they cannot create a defensible space. I get that its beautiful scenery but if you want to build on it you should be required to have a defensible space if you want insurance.Part of the solution...the greater the risk, the higher the insurance. Don't make others substantially subsidize people who want to live in high-risk areas. The subsidizing fuels more construction in places that should have insurance factored in, which right now, it doesn't in many risky areas. We should always have a safety net but many homes have enjoyed artificially low home insurance rates beyond govt meddling.
IronicFucking State Farm Stadium?!?!
California insurer canceled policies months before Los Angeles wildfires
Residents in one of the neighborhoods currently being ravaged by fire, were left scrambling for coverage.www.newsweek.com
Or you just have effective leadership with your priorities correct.The best solution would be to not allow homes to be built so close together they cannot create a defensible space. I get that its beautiful scenery but if you want to build on it you should be required to have a defensible space if you want insurance.
So sorry, hoping for the best.She just got the mandatory evacuation notice