L.A. fires

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Jacobarch

Legend
Joined
Mar 28, 2016
Messages
5,683
Name
Jake
This won't help attract FAs this year.... not that its that important right now, but just saying.

It's fine to talk about. California is kinda a mess
I believe California passed a law prohibiting insurance companies from canceling existing policies so in a way, the insurance companies might be fleeing California as soon as they possibly can. I hope the people affected get the help they need. It's a sad situation and I hope everyone helps each other out.

Insurance companies have already preemptively left California over the last 3 years. 5 major companies have left which has caused a massive issue with coverage as others have pointed out in this thread. Problem is, say if over a million people were effected by this then the remaining insurance companies would have to pick them up on coverage and to take on that many clients in that short amount of time really puts a lot of liability on the insurance companies because there's no time to mitigate the possibility of a claim. It's the same reason why they have enrollment periods for covered California. Taking on too many people at once can overwhelm the system.
 

RamFanWA

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
3,843
Name
DavidG
Taken from the LA Rams facebook post
-- AD making a contribution to LAFD!

1736709765938.png
 

RAMSinLA

Hall of Fame
Joined
Mar 28, 2015
Messages
3,200
I understand what you are saying concerning fire breaks, but how effective would they have been with the v80 mph winds
Probably not a lot but they give water drops a chance to slow the fire down. My point is we all knew this day will come and we didn't prepare so its on all Californians we did this to ourselves.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,008
Anyone know whether Stan's home in Malibu escaped the fire?
 

TSFH Fan

Epic Music Guy
Joined
Dec 5, 2014
Messages
1,552


Right-wing video marked as inappropriate propaganda (i.e. politics) - predominately anti-environmentalist.

Firebreaks and water issues are discussed above. The propaganda in the video includes trying to falsely link the dam removal project to the water pressure issues and the talk of blame of Newsom and the one-party government.

I've seen nothing that the Malibu dam was good for anything and that the only benefit, which benefits ended around 70 years ago, was to the private people who built it.
By the time Rindge died in 1941, she had just $750. By then, the relatively new dam was already in decline. The reservoir filled with sediment soon after her death, “quickly reaching its life expectancy much sooner than anticipated,” Marlow said, adding that this is a testament to the challenges of dam building in Southern California, where high loads of sediment from the ever-eroding mountains course through watersheds.



Edit: Related:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the governing body responsible for maintaining the National Inventory of Dams, has flagged 76% of existing U.S. dams as having “high hazard potential,” a FEMA designation “for any dam whose failure or mis-operation will cause loss of human life and significant property destruction.” In the case of the Iron Gate Dam, Willis pointed out the green growth floating on the stagnant reservoir’s surface: toxic algae in what is supposed to be a water supply source. And because of aged-out infrastructure, some dams can put people in danger of catastrophic flooding, as more extreme climate events become more common.
 
Last edited:

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
12,808
Right-wing video marked as inappropriate propaganda (i.e. politics) - predominately anti-environmentalist.

Firebreaks and water issues are discussed above. The propaganda in the video includes trying to falsely link the dam removal project to the water pressure issues and the talk of blame of Newsom and the one-party government.

I've seen nothing that the Malibu dam was good for anything and that the only benefit, which benefits ended around 70 years ago, was to the private people who built it.




Edit: Related:

Yes its Right wing to explain why LA has no freaking water.

People like you are exactly why things are how they are. How those people who had everything burnt down can appreciate people like you playing the politics game instead of taking care of the people.

Bringing politics is banned here EDITED by Mod at Corbin's request to remove the last word of this sentence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RamFan503

Grill and Brew Master
Moderator
Joined
Jun 24, 2010
Messages
35,091
Name
Stu
I am pretty sure that no matter how much water was available.. it would’ve made a very small difference.
The problem with this logic is that you’re not taking into account the early stages of a fire. That is by far the most important period. Having 40 times the amount of water available would have helped in gravity pressure and then also preventing restarts in areas that may have been controlled.
One thing for sure WE KNOW.. is that Climate Change is the biggest driver of the fires.
No we don’t. In the Camp fire, it was poorly maintained power lines and a severe and artificially accumulated fuel load. In this case there was also a huge dry fuel load. It is not unusual at all to have long periods with no rain. What is unusual in nature is the fuel load that has been dictated to be left.

Another poster mentioned fire breaks in the Chatsworth hills. My dad was with the LAFD and for a period of time was a smoke jumper. His dad was also a LAFD captain. He said what is missing from the argument is that they also used those breaks to maintain undergrowth and do controlled burns. That practice is a thing of the past pretty much since the 70s maybe early 80s.

Since that time, people have built houses in very questionable areas and also fought efforts to maintain wild lands because idiots don’t like the ugliness for a few months. It’s not about politics. I’m sure there is an abundance from both sides of the aisle.
Drought plus crazy windstorms = unstoppable fires.
Yes and no. Three months with very little rain does not equal drought in a semi-arid desert. CA just went through a very high rainfall period.

Lack of preparation and perfect conditions are both to blame. It’s fair to question what caused parts of the perfect conditions.

When the fire budgets were cut, the majority of the cuts were to prevention areas. It seems a little early for those cuts to have manifested themselves so I don’t really buy into the argument that cuts were somehow responsible. I don’t think there were many power cuts but I don’t know for sure.
That’s interesting to know. I know in the oil fields they pump brine water down the well holes.
Found this
View attachment 69273

Guess there is enough money in the oil industry they can replace at their discreción.
Yeah. I think you’re looking at completely different scenarios. They are constantly running and maintaining that equipment. With fire protection, you have to keep water waiting at the ready. I’m not going to say it can’t be done and made effective. I just have my doubts.
But.. no CA govt policy lead to a completely dry winter.. and a catastrophic wind event in the middle of winter.
No but the lack of understory maintenance certainly was a policy. The budget cuts were a policy. The decision to contract out the repair of a reservoir cover (taking over 18 months) when reportedly they always did it in house before was a policy.

I just hope they learn something from all this. But they have to look at all angles to do so. Climate, building materials, defensible spaces, understory maintenance, skid roads and the likes to get to these areas, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.