Who is your all time St.Louis Rams team?

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

Juggs

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
5,491
ROD Credit 2025
2,279
Okay, let's see how each of you would lay it out.

Offense-This will be easy

QB-K.Warner
HB-M.Faulk
FB-R.Holcombe
WR-T.Holt
WR-I.Bruce
WR-D.Amendola
TE-J.Cook
LT-O.Pace
LG-T.Nutton
C-A.McCollum
RG-A.Timmerman
RT-J.Slater

Defense-not as easy
LE-K.Carter
RE-R.Quinn
DT-M.Brockers
DT-J.Zgonina(couldn't think of one better... Maybe D.Farr?)
OLB-P.Tinoisamoa
OLB-A.Ogletree
MLB-L.Fletcher
CB-T.Light
CB-A.Williams
S-K.Lyle
S-O.Atogwe

K-J.Wilkins
P-J.Hekker

I tried to get away from those early 2000 teams, but it's hard. Let's see your variations!
 
Az Hakim > Amendola
Ryan Tucker > Slater (Slater only played one game in STL)
Bartell > Williams (Williams only 22 games at CB before move to safety)
 
Last edited:
I don't put stake in OZ. Slater won for me because he was so damn great, and he only needed to suit up in St.Louis to count for me lol. I had Dre Bly to start and was gonna put Williams at safety, but OJ and Lyle were to good to take off
 
If the title would be Rams all time team...There are soooo many better players as a whole.
 
But that's not the game! Lol and come on HWH, how could you put a rookie ahead of DA?
 
But that's not the game! Lol and come on HWH, how could you put a rookie ahead of DA?

Let's see here, DA could only stay on the field for like 3 plays before he broke something. And Austin is the best return man we've had here in St. Louis, and that includes Az "fumble" Hakim.
 
Yeah. I'll just take everyone who was on the 1999 team. That seems like a pretty solid recipe.
 
It was pretty damn hard to go away from the 99 squad. That line was great back then. But I took McCullom over Grudidoria
 
Okay, let's see how each of you would lay it out.

Offense-This will be easy

QB-K.Warner
HB-M.Faulk
FB-R.Holcombe Hodgins the Hammer
WR-T.Holt
WR-I.Bruce
WR-D.Amendola The Wizard of Az
TE-J.Cook Ernie Conwell
LT-O.Pace
LG-T.Nutton Saffold
C-A.McCollum
RG-A.Timmerman
RT-J.Slater

Defense-not as easy
LE-K.Carter Prefer Leonard Little in pass rush situations
RE-R.Quinn
DT-M.Brockers
DT-J.Zgonina(couldn't think of one better... Maybe D.Farr?) D'Marco Farr
OLB-P.Tinoisamoa Roman Phifer
OLB-A.Ogletree
MLB-L.Fletcher
CB-T.Light
CB-A.Williams
S-K.Lyle
S-O.Atogwe Toby Wright

K-J.Wilkins
P-J.Hekker

I tried to get away from those early 2000 teams, but it's hard. Let's see your variations!
 
No way is Conwell on the list. He was a good dude, but Cook was the best rams TE statistically ever I believe.
 
No way is Conwell on the list. He was a good dude, but Cook was the best rams TE statistically ever I believe.

Conwell was a decathlete with incredible strength. Lining him up as an inline blocker was like lining up an extra OL guy. He could manhandle DE's all by himself. As a total TE package---catching and blocking---I put him over Cook easily.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rambitious1
Considering the value of these players is mostly based on their career, I don't think you can use current Ram players on any All-time Rams team. I mean, Hekker had one excellent record-breaking season. Quinn was all-world in 2013, but will that continue? Even Chris Long hasn't completed his career arc, and he's the longest active Ram. Most of these players have hardly established themselves. Potential does not equal all-time.

Az Hakim > Amendola
 
  • Like
Reactions: A55VA6
Oh, and Leonard Little opposite of Quinn would be a nightmare upon all nightmares for the opposing teams if they tried to throw the ball!
 
  • Like
Reactions: -X-
DE is tough because the Rams have had the best throughout history.
 
Yes but you can only pick St.Louis Rams. As far as little, I struggle putting him above K.Carter. Quinn just broke Carter's sack record , not littles