Trying to understand the value; Goff and Wentz

  • To unlock all of features of Rams On Demand please take a brief moment to register. Registering is not only quick and easy, it also allows you access to additional features such as live chat, private messaging, and a host of other apps exclusive to Rams On Demand.

ottoman89

Busch Light slammin, hog farmin, Iowa boy.
Joined
Jun 27, 2010
Messages
5,210
Name
Josh Otto
Ryan Pace really traded up for Mitch Trubisky and is going to now trade for Carson Wentz.

Makes Billy Devaney look smart.
 

Corbin

THIS IS MY BOOOOOMSTICK!!
Rams On Demand Sponsor
2023 Sportsbook Champion
Joined
Nov 9, 2014
Messages
12,890
Ryan Pace really traded up for Mitch Trubisky and is going to now trade for Carson Wentz.

Makes Billy Devaney look smart.
1612721496206.png


That's crazy was just thinking of today having beers getting interviewed. lol
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
9,180
Name
Jim
I’ll be very curious to see what Wentz brings.

I wouldn’t expect it to be all that much under his contract, but it only takes one team to love him
I am guessing a #1 and a #3. Especially if there are multiple teams bidding.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,206
I don't like the metrics of this trade for the Bears. How much does he help them over what they had, not sure that he's better than just sticking with Trubitsky, both those options are bad IMO. How well does he fit there, IMO they'll be drafting another QB soon i.e. next year's draft.

There is a pretty large gulf between a guy like Stafford and Wentz. Stafford got through that young vet period and built his game. If Chicago gives up any sort of haul for Wentz they're gonna be a laughingstock. But I suppose Bradford taught us that talent at QB means you'll get a bazillion chances lol.

I will say that there's something to be said for hunting for a QB by sorting the discard pile. You can certainly hit that way. But I just think the Bears are a stupid team and a stupid organization and this time next year they'll be looking for a coach.
 

Allen2McVay

Legend
Joined
Mar 29, 2020
Messages
9,180
Name
Jim
People were saying, we traded a first and a third for Stafford, and traded another first to get rid of Goff's contract

Here’s another reason why I think that whole one and three for Stafford was bull shit.

Adam Schefter is reporting that Carolina offered this year’s #1 along with Bridgewater and a #5 for Stafford.

The Panthers #1 is eighth-overall. I would think that is more valuable than the Rams’ #1s in 2022 and 2023 which would both be projected to be in the 20s.
 

Dz1

Go Hurricanes...
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Aug 12, 2020
Messages
1,357
Name
Danger Zone
And plus future picks lose a round per year of waiting on JJs chart.
 

Bearrister

Rookie
Joined
Jul 31, 2018
Messages
138
Here’s another reason why I think that whole one and three for Stafford was bull shit.

Adam Schefter is reporting that Carolina offered this year’s #1 along with Bridgewater and a #5 for Stafford.

The Panthers #1 is eighth-overall. I would think that is more valuable than the Rams’ #1s in 2022 and 2023 which would both be projected to be in the 20s.


Exactly. I posted this earlier in the thread, but this is where the Lions’ interest in Goff is key. Reports were that they actually wanted Goff - he wasn’t just a salary cap dump. The Lions actually viewed Goff as an asset - that’s how the Rams got over the hump and beat out Carolina and Washington’s offers. 2 future late 1st round picks weren’t gonna cut it. Including Goff is what put it over the top and got the Stafford deal done.
 

Merlin

Damn the torpedoes
Rams On Demand Sponsor
ROD Credit | 2023 TOP Member
Joined
May 8, 2014
Messages
41,206
Here’s another reason why I think that whole one and three for Stafford was bull shit.

Adam Schefter is reporting that Carolina offered this year’s #1 along with Bridgewater and a #5 for Stafford.

The Panthers #1 is eighth-overall. I would think that is more valuable than the Rams’ #1s in 2022 and 2023 which would both be projected to be in the 20s.
I think we got lucky with a trade partner who actually wanted those picks in two different years because their model is a slow and deliberate rebuild. In a year or two that desire might change of course but it sure served us well.

Also Goff is very durable. Which is important in a rebuild QB. And he will have a chance to be the guy too if he plays well. So one of those trades that IMO helps both teams as well as both QBs. Some will tell me that Goff was not helped by this but it's not good for him to be making big money for a contender when he's gotta rebuild his game.
 

Karate61

There can be no excellence without effort.
Rams On Demand Sponsor
SportsBook Bookie
Camp Reporter
Joined
Sep 10, 2014
Messages
7,079
Name
Jeff
Thought this thread was about Golf, so nevermind!
 

Rams77

Starter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
561
The issue is this. If we fid not include Goff in the Stafford trade then everyone would knoe we had to get rid ogf goff and it would be the talib trade. I.e. pay someone to takt giff.

ideally we would have traded goff prior to the stafford deal. That did not happen
Lol it looks like you started drinking early for the Super Bowl based on the spellinh
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,617
Name
Burger man
I think we got lucky with a trade partner who actually wanted those picks in two different years because their model is a slow and deliberate rebuild. In a year or two that desire might change of course but it sure served us well.

Also Goff is very durable. Which is important in a rebuild QB. And he will have a chance to be the guy too if he plays well. So one of those trades that IMO helps both teams as well as both QBs. Some will tell me that Goff was not helped by this but it's not good for him to be making big money for a contender when he's gotta rebuild his game.

If you’re building something, you need the ammo to maneuver.

Having it “stockpiled” feels like a good “new GM“ strategy. Sorta buys some patience.
 

dieterbrock

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
24,693
I don't like the metrics of this trade for the Bears. How much does he help them over what they had, not sure that he's better than just sticking with Trubitsky, both those options are bad IMO. How well does he fit there, IMO they'll be drafting another QB soon i.e. next year's draft.
Bears have a championship caliber defense, with a short window of opportunity left (like the Rams), but currently have no QB. Cant think you can win with Foles, Trubisky is gone, they didnt pick up his 5th year option.
Wentz has played at an incredibly high level at times in the NFL, while the injuries are alarming, I think he's definitely worth the risk for a team like the Bears.
 

Mackeyser

Supernovas are where gold forms; the only place.
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
14,519
Name
Mack
The more other teams are navigating the waters looking for a QB, the more Stafford looks like a prize (and Goff, too, by extension).

Teams like the 9ers, Colts and Bears? Oof.

Really makes me wonder if the 9ers are contemplating sending Nick Bosa, another player and 3 1sts to the Texans for Watson... or if they gonna ride the Jimmy G train for another season...
 

PhillyRam

Rams On Demand Sponsor
Rams On Demand Sponsor
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
7,459
Name
Scott
The more other teams are navigating the waters looking for a QB, the more Stafford looks like a prize (and Goff, too, by extension).

Teams like the 9ers, Colts and Bears? Oof.

Really makes me wonder if the 9ers are contemplating sending Nick Bosa, another player and 3 1sts to the Texans for Watson... or if they gonna ride the Jimmy G train for another season...
It will be interesting comparing Niners approach to the Rams.

Niners might be willing to give JG another yr and possibly seeing what other options they will have next yr.... vs going all in, trading away multiple firsts and your 26 yr old QB for a 33 yr old quick fix and potentially short term solution.
 

CGI_Ram

Hamburger Connoisseur
Moderator
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
49,617
Name
Burger man
Really makes me wonder if the 9ers are contemplating sending Nick Bosa, another player and 3 1sts to the Texans for Watson... or if they gonna ride the Jimmy G train for another season...

I can see this happening.

Yikes. I hope not.

Dear 49'ers; Cousins is awesome. Go that route.
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,618
Name
mojo
It will be interesting comparing Niners approach to the Rams.

Niners might be willing to give JG another yr and possibly seeing what other options they will have next yr.... vs going all in, trading away multiple firsts and your 26 yr old QB for a 33 yr old quick fix and potentially short term solution.
Potential FA QB's in 2022

Roethlisberger
Brady
Brees
Taysom Hill
Mariota
Mayfield
Foles
Darnold
Josh Allen
Lamar Jackson
John the Wolf Wolford
 

Mojo Ram

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
23,618
Name
mojo
Every day that goes by with Watson talks and no QB movement in Niner land makes me nervous.