What was the task of the list then? If it was top 10 just my the numbers, I didn’t follow that. I may have missed the point.
My list is best Rams QB’s(in my lifetime). Put them on the field in a vacuum and simply rate them based on their ability. I watched these guys play. I didn’t even look at the numbers.
It’s offseason. I’m just having some fun. there was no point. It was a list. My opinion. That’s all. even my jabs at you were in fun. I respect your take (except the brothel stuff. All them chicks got the clap. I pick none)
I never saw Van Brocklin, Waterfield, barely remember Gabriel and only with the Eagles, vaguely remember seeing Hadl. Harris was the first QB I remember well. So yeah. I had to rely on film I’ve seen, and accomplishments, and numbers a bit. It was that kind of list. But the “eye test” was a huge part.
The eye test is why Everett sank so low. I was at the 1989 NFCCG in my Rams gear at Candlestick. Humiliating. Shouldn’t he be #1, since his stats are greater than the rest? hell no. Shouldn’t your eye test put Case Keenum or Baker Mayfield ahead of some of these guys? Bulger had some great years, and some not-so-great. What happened there? Maybe he belongs ahead of Goff, and Everett Though. Fun to debate in the off-season. Everyone sees things a little different.
Edit: By the way to
@den-the-coach point, how much did coaching affect the success of these guys? As much as I jest with my Avatar, and signature line, how much could Knox and management have held back Harris, for example? Was Bulger, or Warner turned loose to maximaize their potential with Martz? How would they have done under George Allen, for example?
Would Goff have just been a typical bust if he were drafted by the Brown Stains? (Yes) A lot of the success of these guys and probably the way they are seen historically, relies on coaching and surrounding personnel.
I would loved to have seen Vincent Ferragamo (Sorry Den, you’ll have to fill me in as to his middle name) under Sean McVay.