- Joined
- Jul 1, 2013
- Messages
- 8,235
- Name
- Don
Sad but this almost makes sense at least from a system standpointTrade him to the 49ers for Kaepernick?
Sad but this almost makes sense at least from a system standpointTrade him to the 49ers for Kaepernick?
Didn't we trade down with them for more picks? They selected Claiborne, we got Brockers.
The Giants fleeced us with Spags, but he made his way back so it's a draw.
We got pick 45 to boot that we traded down again with chicago who took Alshon Jeffery and we took Rok Watkins and Pead.To lazy to look it up, but we got Brockers AND another pick - think it was a 4th.
We got pick 45 to boot that we traded down again with chicago who took Alshon Jeffery and we took Rok Watkins and Pead.
We got pick 45 to boot that we traded down again with chicago who took Alshon Jeffery and we took Rok Watkins and Pead.
Man, freak Eagles fans. As soon as I heard him say "as bad as the 3-13 team in 1998" I shut that crap the freak off. freak you dude. Try enduring 3-13, 2-14 and 1-15 in 3 consecutive seasons. I swear some fans have no appreciation for their team at all. Just be happy you actually have one.
For some it'll always be the QB, some people look at all those players on the field and just see the man behind the center.I'm no Bradford fan but he was 15/28 270 yards and three TD's no picks...sounds like there are more things wrong in Philly than the QB.
Elvis, is that you?No worries Sam, your QB coach Pat Shurmur will fix you...
We got pick 45 to boot that we traded down again with chicago who took Alshon Jeffery and we took Rok Watkins and Pead.
Bradford has been good in 2 halves of games this year. The 2nd half of both the opener and yesterday. Otherwise he has been awful.
Foles still plays for Philly? 'cause thats with this thread was about...Not saying one thing or the other.... just found it interesting...
But you could say (nearly) the exact same thing about Foles...(he looked good both halves against Seattle)
Foles still plays for Philly? 'cause thats with this thread was about...
That said, I thought Foles was pretty dammed good against Zona. I'd give him 4 good halves. Not that Im comparing
Sam hasn't played a complete game yet. He played well in the 2nd half of 2 games. Foles has played well in 2 games entirely.True. I'm sorry for thinking it was an interesting comparison.
The conversation might be about Philly... but if your going to point that out I will just respond with the fact that this is a Rams forum, so it would seem that any convo on this forum would be open for comparison.
Foles has looked good week one, bad the next two and good again week 4.
Some would say the same about Sam.
I like Foles. Sometimes it's ugly, sometimes It's awesome. Kinda like Bradford too.
I'm happy.
Yep one against the no. 1 defense in the nfl the previous season, and the undefeated Cards with a great defense as well. Loving me some Foles!Sam hasn't played a complete game yet. He played well in the 2nd half of 2 games. Foles has played well in 2 games entirely.
There isn't a comparison.
The Cowboys. Look at my avatar. I don't know about the blue font. Thank you, mods? Lol
Heard this on Philly Sports Talk this Morning, in regard to Chips future..lol
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTUJSEFKSBE
We still could have been fine there. I actually liked Lavante David the most of the LB's in that draft and was praying they'd take him. He was still available. That probably means we wouldn't have taken Ogletree, though. Best bet probably would have been to stay put and take Wagner. Just imagine Wagner, Ogletree and JL playing together.Traded down once too many. Still it looks like great maneuvering if you just look at the pick values and not the players with the benefit of hindsight. At the time we had a lot of holes so moving down and getting more picks made sense. Plus, you spread your bets. Bottom line is Brockers + a ham sandwich is better than Claiborne!
Better than RGIII as well. Ha!