brucebruce
Rookie
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
- Messages
- 407
Gotta heavily disagree here. I highly, highly, highly (while I get high too) so extra highly doubt we'd get Herbert but Stafford is closer to retiring than not. Herbert would be an awesome get and just as talented as Stafford. Once again, I don't see it happening though.Whatever the truth is, Herbert couldn't elevate his team to score more than three points in the second half vs the Jags. He was not clutch like a a Super Bowl winning QB should be, therefore I'd rather have Stafford for 2-3 years more than the Renter's QB.
The Chargers will likely start talks with Herbert’s agent about a long-term extension during the offseason. Because he made the Pro Bowl last year, Herbert’s fifth-year option will be the franchise transition tag. Those figures will be announced early in March, but early projections are at least $30.4 million.
The Chargers might also wait to see if Cincinnati signs Joe Burrow to an extension this year, which would set the market for Herbert, Miami’s Tua Tagovailoa and Philadelphia’s Jalen Hurts.
I think for this rumour to have any legitimacy, the Vikings would have to throw Hunter in the mix.I don’t know about Herbert to the Rams. Would probably need to give up Rob Havenstein to make it work, and none of us would want to do that …
Coincidentally, the update guy on, I think it was 710 in LA, kept calling him Justin Ay-bear (or "Eh-bear" or "A-Bear") this week.I heard the same thing… except it was about Bobby Hebert.
So it does actually matter to a degree because of upfront bonuses. But I still call bullshit on the OP's claim.Well, your source is quite frankly an idiot who should probably learn math before trying to understand football.
Being "cheap" is irrelevant since the team will spend annually in accordance to what the cap will allow.
If the Cap is 250 mill in 2024, it doesnt matter if Herbert is getting 20 mill or 0, they will still be spending (in theory) 250 mill
So it does actually matter to a degree because of upfront bonuses.