- Joined
- Jan 3, 2013
- Messages
- 24,057
Owners represent the league, there is no way for them to engage in a different football league without involving the CBA. Its just not possible.
LolThe real answer to college football's and the NFL's problem, is College Football itself. College players rightfully grouse about not getting paid while the college itself and it's HC's make millions. The students themselves, mostly don't care about college and the professors at University, a lot of which resent the football program for its power within the University.
The real answer is to eliminate college football, and make an NFL sanctioned semi-pro league. Make it like the minors in baseball, and take away the BS idea of amateur athletics at university. The NFL would finally have a pipeline of lower level coaching and playing talent, that is invested in training players in NFL-like systems, and guys like Kurt Warner who are not quite ready for the NFL, get developed.
Fisher may not have done well with Goff once he got to L.A., but he had nothing to do with the fact that Goff hadn't taken a snap under center or called a play in a huddle his entire career at Cal. As far as NFL development is concerned, that isn't working.Unfortunately for him, the NFL doesn't have quality control when it comes to employed coaches.
Worked fine for Prescott and Wentz though....Fisher may not have done well with Goff once he got to L.A., but he had nothing to do with the fact that Goff hadn't taken a snap under center or called a play in a huddle his entire career at Cal. As far as NFL development is concerned, that isn't working.
Wentz is debatable. Even he came out of college with issues. Either way, this type of league is more about developing guys who aren't receiving NFL reps or need to learn NFL offense and defense. College programs are going to teach shotgun spread and air raid offenses because they work at that level. What 90% of colleges aren't doing is providing game experience with NFL style gameplay.Worked fine for Prescott and Wentz though....
I know the ones that don't participate in class discussions...the same ones that joke about getting "D's" on exams....Not all, but MANY that I have seen act this way...As for how many get drafted, has that stopped the majority from dreaming of being one of the "200"? Of course I know the limited number even make the practice squad, only to be cut come the regular season, but if the kids I know at university, academics are just a hurdle to playing football/sports.Lol
You know how many kids play college football? There has to be over 300 schools in Div 1 and 1aa alone. Then there's the lower levels
And only 200 or so get drafted.
There are many (most) kids who play football with no intention to ever play pro but to earn a degree....
There's like 100 kids on a D1 college team and yeah, maybe 10% of them aren't serious about their education. Heck even if 50% aren't serious the numbers are staggeringI know the ones that don't participate in class discussions...the same ones that joke about getting "D's" on exams....Not all, but MANY that I have seen act this way...As for how many get drafted, has that stopped the majority from dreaming of being one of the "200"? Of course I know the limited number even make the practice squad, only to be cut come the regular season, but if the kids I know at university, academics are just a hurdle to playing football/sports.
I still think the best idea I've seen was a league that stocked teams based on ex-NCAA affiliation. I imagine fans would enjoy a developmental team based in LA stocked with USC, UCLA, UCSD players taking on a team in Texas with players from Texas, Texas A&M, etc.
I'll concede that I may be getting a higher percentage of the 10-50%, since I am getting a history degree, and for many jocks getting the obligatory teaching degree for history, puts us in the same classes at times. I am a beyond serious student, never having gotten less than a 4.0 in my upper level course-work, so I don't respect the process right now...jmho.There's like 100 kids on a D1 college team and yeah, maybe 10% of them aren't serious about their education. Heck even if 50% aren't serious the numbers are staggering
That's great, and good for you man.I'll concede that I may be getting a higher percentage of the 10-50%, since I am getting a history degree, and for many jocks getting the obligatory teaching degree for history, puts us in the same classes at times. I am a beyond serious student, never having gotten less than a 4.0 in my upper level course-work, so I don't respect the process right now...jmho.